ArticleJTCVS open2023
Doubly committed ventricular septal defect: Is it safe to perform surgical closure through the pulmonary trunk approached by right vertical axillary thoracotomy?
Article in JTCVS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Right axillary thoracotomy versus median sternotomy for repair of subarterial ventricular septal defect in adolescents and adults.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy for surgical repair of paediatric ventricular septal defect: a propensity score matched cohort study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the safety of performing surgical repair for doubly committed ventricular septal defects by right vertical infra-axillary minithoracotomy (RVIAT). Methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent doubly committed ventricular septal defects closure from January 2019 to May 2022. Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study and treated with either the median sternotomy approach (MSA: n = 37) or the RVIAT approach (RVIAT: n = 37). Results: The median weight and age in the MSA group were significantly lower than those in the RVIAT group (MSA: 6.0 kg [interquartile range] (IQR), 5.2 to 8.7 kg] vs RVIAT: 7.5 kg [IQR, 5.6-14 kg]; Conclusions: Closure of doubly committed ventricular septal defects through the pulmonary trunk by the RVIAT approach is feasible and safe, and does not increase the risk of bypass-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.