ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Hysterectomy through Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical High-grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Reassessment of the Specimens' Eligibility for Histological Examination.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The New Concepts from New Evidences.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Laparoscopic and Open Surgeries in Patients with Stage IA1 Cervical Cancer.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Jain Point for First Blind Trocar Insertion: Fellows' Perspective.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective was to investigate the microscopic artifacts made in the uterus of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) resected by hysterectomy through minimally invasive (H-MI) procedures and to verify whether these specimens are suitable for histopathological assessment. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 28 patients with cervical HSIL, consisting of 21 premenopausal and seven postmenopausal women, who underwent H-MI. The proportion of the cervical mucosa covered by intact surface epithelium (residual ratio [RR]) was measured on microscopically. Surgical margin's status was also verified. Results: All cases developed detachment of the cervical surface epithelium to a varying extent. The RR was significantly higher in the premenopausal patients (median: 75.5%) than in the postmenopausal patients (median: 37.6%). Among the premenopausal patients, the RR was lower in the cases on whom uterine manipulator (UM) was used (median: 70.5%) than in the cases without UM use (median 92.7%). Among the 21 cases whose resected uterus contained HSIL, the vaginal resection margin was not assessable in three (14.2%) of the seven postmenopausal cases due to the artifact. Conclusion: Although transvaginal manipulation of the uterus causes detachment of the cervical surface epithelium, H-MI for cervical HSIL provides an acceptable specimen for histological assessment in premenopausal patients, even if UM is used. In postmenopausal women, H-MI easily develops artifactual loss of cervical surface epithelium, sometimes providing an unfavorable specimen for microscopic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.