ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Surgical Morbidity of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Overview.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of rapid recovery outcomes between vNOTES hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- The Strategies to Improve Healthcare Provider - Focus on Nurses.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
- Early versus Delayed Removal of Urinary Catheter after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Prospective Observational Study.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
- Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Hysterectomy in Gynecological Disease(s): An Overview.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- A Survey of Surgeon Interest in Individually Sized Laparoscopic Instruments.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Laparoscopic skills are not an innate behavior, nor can they be easily mimicked, and can only be acquired through hands-on training. The need for reliable training and its assessment is becoming increasingly important with the course of time. Materials and Methods: A retrospective comparative study was done in a tertiary care center where all patients undergoing hysterectomy by laparoscopic and abdominal route were included in the study. Objectives: Our study aims to compare the operative and postoperative complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. The study was conducted from June 2016 to October 2022. Results: The mean operative time for uteri size lesser than 12 weeks was found significant in the total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) group (75 ± 25 min) to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) (117 ± 28 min, Conclusion: TLH when performed efficiently has proved to be a preferable route over other conventional hysterectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.