Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37807878›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2023

The Association Between Atherogenic Index of Plasma and No-Reflow Phenomenon in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

İbrahim Etem Çelik, Selçuk Öztürk, Mikail Yarlıoğlu, Ozan Barutçu, Onur Akgün, Mustafa Duran, Şükrü Yorulmaz, Sani Namık Murat

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Factors Influencing the Risk of No-Reflow Development.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

İbrahim Etem ÇelikDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Selçuk ÖztürkDepartment of Cardiology, Kırıkkale Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Kırıkkale, Türkiye.
Mikail YarlıoğluDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ozan BarutçuDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Onur AkgünDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Mustafa DuranDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Şükrü YorulmazDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Sani Namık MuratDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
University of Health Sciences Antigua · AG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a biomarker of plasma atherogenicity. Elevated AIP is linked with adverse cardiac events. We sought to examine the association of admission AIP and no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patient population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

methodsEight hundred eight-four ACS patients were included to statistical tests retrospectively and classified according to the occurrence of NRP: NRP (-) (n = 662) and NRP (+) (n = 186). AIP levels were calculated through the formula log10 (triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio).

resultsAIP levels were higher in NRP (+) patients compared to NRP (-) group patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for AIP to predict NRP yielded an area under the ROC curve value 0.643 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.596-0.690, P <.001]. AIP was associated with NRP in univariate logistic regression analysis [Odds Ratio (OR): 2.46; P =.001; CI: 1.44 (lower limit)-4.21 (upper limit)]. However, AIP did not emerge as a significant prognostic factor of NRP in multiple logistic regression analysis [OR: 2.11; P =.422; CI: 0.34 (lower limit)-13.11 (upper limit)]. On the other hand, peak troponin T (log10) was an independent prognostic factor for NRP [OR: 0.13; P <.001; CI: 0.10 (lower limit)-0.37 (upper limit)] occurrence.

conclusionThe AIP level on admission is not a statistically significant prognostic factor of NRP. However, peak troponin T (log10) is an independent prognostic parameter of NRP.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAtherosclerosisNo-Reflow PhenomenonPercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTroponin TTroponin T

Identifiers

PMID37807878
PMCPMC10698378
OpenAlexW4387439285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.