ArticleTrends in hearing
Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: A Modeling Study.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The parallel auditory brainstem response paradigm provides accurate and fast hearing thresholds in a clinic-like setting.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Bone conducted responses using the parallel auditory brainstem response (pABR) paradigm.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Fundamental frequency predominantly drives talker differences in auditory brainstem responses to continuous speech.JASA express letters · 2024Article
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Fundamental frequency predominantly drives talker differences in auditory brainstem responses to continuous speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Optimal Parameters for Measuring Multiband Auditory Brainstem Responses to Continuous Speech.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While each place on the cochlea is most sensitive to a specific frequency, it will generally respond to a sufficiently high-level stimulus over a wide range of frequencies. This spread of excitation can introduce errors in clinical threshold estimation during a diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) exam. Off-frequency cochlear excitation can be mitigated through the addition of masking noise to the test stimuli, but introducing a masker increases the already long test times of the typical ABR exam. Our lab has recently developed the parallel ABR (pABR) paradigm to speed up test times by utilizing randomized stimulus timing to estimate the thresholds for multiple frequencies simultaneously. There is reason to believe parallel presentation of multiple frequencies provides masking effects and improves place specificity while decreasing test times. Here, we use two computational models of the auditory periphery to characterize the predicted effect of parallel presentation on place specificity in the auditory nerve. We additionally examine the effect of stimulus rate and level. Both models show the pABR is at least as place specific as standard methods, with an improvement in place specificity for parallel presentation (vs. serial) at high levels, especially at high stimulus rates. When simulating hearing impairment in one of the models, place specificity was also improved near threshold. Rather than a tradeoff, this improved place specificity would represent a secondary benefit to the pABR's faster test times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.