ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023
Cefiderocol use for the treatment of infections by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an Italian multicentre real-life experience.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of antimicrobial-resistant infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Cefiderocol Targeted Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections: An Observational Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of Cefiderocol in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli (Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) Infections: An Expert Statement.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Innovative Antibiotics: The Experience of Cefiderocol in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Potential of Cefiderocol in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cefiderocol: A Comprehensive Review of Chemistry, Mechanisms of Resistance, and Clinical Applications in the Era of Multidrug Resistance.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Activity of cefiderocol againstMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and safety of cefiderocol treatment in patients with Gram-negative bacterial infections in Spain in the early access programme: results of the PERSEUS study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- Real-Life Cefiderocol Use in Bone and Joint Infection: A French National Cohort.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Infections by VIM-Type-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Article
- In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Five Newly Approved Antibiotics against Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteria-A Pilot Study in Bulgaria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cefiderocol and Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin with promising activity against most carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB). However, extensive postmarketing experiences are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the early experience on cefiderocol postmarketing use at three tertiary care hospitals in Italy.
methodsWe retrospectively included patients with infections caused by CRGNB treated with cefiderocol at three Italian tertiary care hospitals from 1 March 2021 to 30 June 2022. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify predictors of 30 day mortality. A propensity score (PS) analysis with inverse probability weighting (IPW) was also performed to compare the treatment effect of cefiderocol monotherapy (CM) versus combination regimens (CCRs).
resultsThe cohort included 142 patients (72% male, median age 67 years, with 89 cases of Acinetobacter baumannii infection, 22 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 27 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 4 of other pathogens). The 30 day all-cause mortality was 37% (52/142). We found no association between bacterial species and mortality. In multivariate analysis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index >3 was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 5.02, 95% CI 2.37-10.66, P < 0.001). In contrast, polymicrobial infection (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P < 0.05) was associated with lower mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients receiving CM (n = 70) and those receiving a CCR (n = 72) (33% versus 40%, respectively), even when adjusted for IPW-PS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-1.96, P = 0.71).
conclusionsReal-life data confirm that cefiderocol is a promising option against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections, even as monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.