Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37807782›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2023

Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer's Disease: Rationale and Implications.

Dale E Bredesen, Kat Toups, Ann Hathaway, Deborah Gordon, Henrianna Chung, Cyrus Raji, Alan Boyd, Benjamin D Hill, Sharon Hausman-Cohen, Mouna Attarha and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Dale E BredesenDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kat ToupsBay Area Wellness, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Ann HathawayDr. Ann Hathaway, San Rafael, CA, USA.
Deborah GordonNorthwest Memory Center, Ashland, OR, USA.
Henrianna ChungQuesgen Systems, Burlingame, CA, USA.
Cyrus RajiDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alan BoydCNS Vital Signs, Morrisville, NC, USA.
Benjamin D HillDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Sharon Hausman-CohenIntellxxDNA, Austin, TX, USA.
Mouna AttarhaPosit Science, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Won Jong ChwaDepartment of Radiology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alexei KurakinDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael JarrettQuesgen Systems, Burlingame, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USAshland (United States) · USCalifornia Wellness Foundation · USCenter for Neurorehabilitation Services · USIntel (United States) · USPosit Science (United States) · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of South Alabama · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurodegenerative disease field has enjoyed extremely limited success in the development of effective therapeutics. One potential reason is the lack of disease models that yield accurate predictions and optimal therapeutic targets. Standard clinical trials have pre-determined a single treatment modality, which may be unrelated to the primary drivers of neurodegeneration. Recent proof-of-concept clinical trials using a precision medicine approach suggest a new model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as a chronic innate encephalitis that creates a network insufficiency. Identifying and addressing the multiple potential contributors to cognitive decline for each patient may represent a more effective strategy. Here we review the rationale for a precision medicine approach in prevention and treatment of cognitive decline associated with AD. Results and implications from recent proof-of-concept clinical trials are presented. Randomized controlled trials, with much larger patient numbers, are likely to be significant to establishing precision medicine protocols as a standard of care for prevention and treatment of cognitive decline. Furthermore, combining this approach with the pharmaceutical approach offers the potential for enhanced outcomes. However, incorporating precision medicine approaches into everyday evaluation and care, as well as future clinical trials, would require fundamental changes in trial design, IRB considerations, funding considerations, laboratory evaluation, personalized treatment plans, treatment teams, and ultimately in reimbursement guidelines. Nonetheless, precision medicine approaches to AD, based on a novel model of AD pathophysiology, offer promise that has not been realized to date with monotherapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionNeurodegenerative DiseasesHumansPrecision MedicineAlzheimer’s diseaseclinical trialmild cognitive impairmentMRI volumetricsneurodegenerationsystems

Identifiers

PMID37807782
PMCPMC10741308
OpenAlexW4387312030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.