Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37807663›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Virtual implantation of Derivo Embolization Devices using PreSize Neurovascular software: Accuracy evaluation and size selection comparison study.

Ngoc T Ngo, Fabian Flottmann, Francesco Iori, Mirko Bonfanti, Aikaterini Mandaltsi, Jens Fiehler, Maxim Bester

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ngoc T NgoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3726-0095
Fabian FlottmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Francesco IoriOxford Heartbeat Ltd, London, UK.
Mirko BonfantiOxford Heartbeat Ltd, London, UK.
Aikaterini MandaltsiOxford Heartbeat Ltd, London, UK.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maxim BesterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundEvaluating the deployed length of flow diverting stents (FDs) to select the optimal device size remains a challenging, yet crucial, task in aneurysm treatment. This study reports on the accuracy of PreSize Neurovascular (Oxford Heartbeat Ltd), a visualization and simulation software for FD intervention planning, in predicting FD deployed length, and on its impact on device size selection.MethodsImaging data from consecutive patients treated with Derivo Embolization Device (Acandis GmbH) were collected from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and retrospectively analyzed. Accuracy evaluation: prediction accuracy was calculated by comparing deployed FD lengths measured from imaging data and simulated by PreSize. Size selection comparison: two Interventional Neuroradiologists (INR1, INR2), blinded to the devices deployed, used PreSize to select the optimal device size (diameter and length). Their choices were compared against the deployed devices selected by conventional planning.ResultsAmong 98 implanted devices, PreSize predicted deployed FD length with a mean accuracy of 94.54% (95% confidence interval [93.72%, 95.35%]). Among 98 aneurysm cases, PreSize-informed device lengths were significantly shorter (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, INR1: W = 394, P < .001, INR2: W = 305, P < .001) by 4.13 and 4.18 mm on average, and up to 20 and 25 mm, for INR1 and INR2, respectively, than the conventionally selected FDs. In 32% of cases, PreSize-informed devices resulted in fewer vessel bends covered by the FD while achieving sufficient aneurysm coverage.ConclusionsPreSize retrospectively predicted deployed FD lengths with high accuracy. Moreover, INRs in this study were more inclined to select shorter stent length in the simulation than they would have done conventionally.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticIntracranial AneurysmSoftwareStentsAgedCerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesaneurysm treatmentDevice selectionflow diverter sizingintervention planningsimulation software

Identifiers

PMID37807663
PMCPMC13305109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.