ReviewCurrent drug research reviews2024
Current Trends on Innovative Technologies in Topical Wound Care for Advanced Healing and Management.
Review in Current drug research reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated in vitro and in silico evaluation of rutin as a potential modulator of wound healing pathways.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Nanostructured propolis ointment and platelet-rich plasma as novel biotherapeutics for cutaneous wound repair in an experimental canine model.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Novel AI-Driven Precision Strategies in Diabetic Wound Healing: Immunomodulation and Advances in Smart Composite Nanocarriers.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Skin Wound Healing: The Impact of Treatment with Antimicrobial Nanoparticles and Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Combination Therapy with Human Chorionic Villi MSCs and Secretory Factors Enhances Cutaneous Wound Healing in a Rat Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Combined Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy and Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Oral Wound Healing: An Experimental Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Physicochemical Characterization of Injectable Genipin-Crosslinked Gelatin-Kelulut Honey Hydrogels for Future Cutaneous Tissue Loss.Polymers · 2025Article
- Molecular Insights into the Interaction of Cathepsin D and Iron in Chronic Wound Healing: Exploring Therapeutic Potential and Mechanisms.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in 3D-(Bio)printed Hydrogels as Wound Dressings.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Latest advance anti-inflammatory hydrogel wound dressings and traditionalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate critically traditional and modern techniques for cutaneous wound healing and to provide comprehensive information on these novel techniques to encounter the challenges with the existing wound healing methods. SIGNIFICANCE: The financial burden and mortality associated with wounds is increasing, so managing wounds is essential. Traditional wound treatments include surgical and non-surgical methods, while modern techniques are advancing rapidly. This review examines the various traditional and modern techniques used for cutaneous wound healing. KEY
findingsTraditional wound treatments include surgical techniques such as debridement, skin flaps, and grafts. Non-surgical treatments include skin replacements, topical formulations, scaffold-based skin grafts, and hydrogel-based skin dressings. More modern techniques include using nanoparticles, growth factors, and bioactive substances in wound dressings. Bioengineered skin substitutes using biomaterials, cells, and growth factors are also being developed. Other techniques include stem cell therapy, growth factor/cytokine therapy, vacuum-assisted wound closure, and 3D-printed/bio-printed wound dressings.
conclusionTraditional wound treatments have been replaced by modern techniques such as stem cell therapy, growth factor/cytokine therapy, vacuum-assisted wound closure, and bioengineered skin substitutes. However, most of these strategies lack effectiveness and thorough evaluation. Therefore, further research is required to develop new techniques for cutaneous wound healing that are effective, cost-efficient, and appealing to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.