ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1986
Aerobic performance capacity in paraplegic subjects.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Exercise Stroke Volume and Its Prediction From Oxygen Pulse in Paralympic Athletes With Locomotor Impairments: Cardiac Long-Term Adaptations Are Possible.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Comparison of Different Blood Lactate Threshold Concepts for Constant Load Performance Prediction in Spinal Cord Injured Handcyclists.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Health-related physical fitness of adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele.European journal of applied physiology · 2008Article
- Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2002Review
- Energy consumption of paraplegic locomotion using reciprocating gait orthosis.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1996Article
- Spinal cord injury, exercise and quality of life.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 1995Review
- Comparison of treadmill exercise testing protocols for wheelchair users.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1993Article
- Influence of posture on arm exercise tolerance and physiologic responses in persons with spinal cord injured paraplegia.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1993Article
- Cardiac output during exercise in paraplegic subjects.European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine adaptation to prolonged exercise in paraplegics, maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) and lactate threshold (LT) were evaluated during an arm cranking exercise in nine patients (P) and nine able-bodied (AB) subjects. Mean VO2max averaged 25.1 and 31.6 ml X min-1 X kg-1 in P and AB groups respectively. VO2max in P was found to be directly related to the level of spinal injury: the higher the lesion the lower the uptake. Lactate threshold expressed as a percentage of VO2max was higher in P (59%) than in AB (43%), and close to that observed in arm-trained athletes. Since training has less effect on VO2max in paraplegics than in able-bodied subjects, attributable to a deficiency in the circulatory adaptation of paraplegics to exercise, the observed differences between AB and P in lactate threshold and submaximal exercise indicate that the possible effect of training in paraplegics is located at the level of intracellular chemistry, with a diminution in glycogenolysis (higher LT) and a higher rate of lipid utilization (lower RQ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.