Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3780699›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1986

Urinary catecholamine responses to basic types of physical activity.

M Gillberg, I Anderzén, T Akerstedt, K Sigurdson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Gillberg
I Anderzén
T Akerstedt
K Sigurdson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary adrenaline, noradrenaline, heart rate, and subjective ratings were obtained from 9 healthy males during six different physical activities, ranging in intensity from lying down to running. Heart rate, subjective ratings and noradrenaline excretion reflected the work load in the different conditions. Adrenaline, on the other hand, failed to show this relationship. There was no significant increase in adrenaline excretion even at the highest work load (corresponding to a heart rate of 160 bpm). It was concluded that urinary adrenaline may safely be used as an indicator of mental factors even in situations with different levels of physical activity.

Indexed as

Physical ExertionAdultBicyclingEpinephrineHeart RateHumansMaleNorepinephrinePostureRunningEpinephrineNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID3780699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.