ReviewNeurosurgical review2023
Risk factors for perianeurysmal vasogenic oedema (pavo) following embolization therapy: literature review.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perianeurysmal edema after coil embolization of a giant ruptured aneurysm: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perianeurysmal vasogenic oedema (PAVO) is a rare complication associated post-embolisation of intracranial aneurysms. The prevalence, risk factors predisposing to susceptibility, and pathologic mechanisms underlying this process are not clearly understood. Since this complication may be associated with poor clinical outcomes, the authors designed this study to describe possible risk factors, underlying mechanisms, and management of PAVO through published case reports. Developing a priori protocol according to PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify case studies and reports of adult patients with intracranial aneurysms who developed perianeurysmal oedema following coil embolization therapy. Data extracted from these studies included patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, coil type, PAVO characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Quality was assessed using a standardized tool. 21 eligible studies of acceptable quality were identified, comprising 40 unique cases from 9 countries. The mean patient age was 56.4 years and 25 (62.5%) were female. Aneurysm size ranged from 6 to 30 mm, with a mean size of 15.2 mm; only 6 (15%) of cases were giant intracranial aneurysm (≥ 25 mm). The more frequent locations of intracranial aneurysms associated with PAVO were the ICA (50%) and posterior circulation (32.5%), with 7.5% and 10% of cases occurring in MCA and anterior circulation, respectively. 16 cases (40%) were treated with bare platinum coils, and 14 (35%) with a combination of BPCs and bioactive coils; in 10 cases (25%), the coil type was not mentioned. PAVO presented between 0 days and 8 years of coil embolization, with 23 (57.5% cases) presenting symptomatically in relation to brain region affected. Management strategies for PAVO included conservative, steroids, re-embolization, clipping, stenting, parent artery occlusion either as monotherapy or as combination therapy. Of reported studies, 26 treated cases (65%) resolved, with 8 (20%) remaining stable, and 4 (10%) deteriorating. PAVO can be associated with small or large intracranial aneurysms, bare and bioactive platinum coils, and all regions of the intracranial circulation. The understanding of the risk factors of this complication lies in the underlying mechanisms, which will ultimately guide appropriate patient follow-up and subsequent optimal management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.