Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37806317›Full record

Observational studyThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Bacterial keratitis in a tertiary hospital in São Paulo: a 21-year review of the epidemiological, laboratory, and clinical data.

Beatriz Avila Zaccaron, Maria Emilia Xavier Dos Santos Araújo, Alexandre Inácio Cruz de Paula, Bruno de Mendonça Costa, Emellyne Pamela Diniz Pires Papalini, Roberta Arb Saba Rodrigues Pinto

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Contact Lens-AssociatedClinical optometry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz Avila ZaccaronHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Ciências da Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital dos Olhos de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: beatrizz@gmail.com.
Maria Emilia Xavier Dos Santos AraújoHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Departamento de Córnea e Doenças Oculares Externas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Inácio Cruz de PaulaHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, Laboratório de Microbiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Bruno de Mendonça CostaHospital dos Olhos de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Emellyne Pamela Diniz Pires PapaliniHospital dos Olhos de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Roberta Arb Saba Rodrigues PintoHospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual · BRHospital São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious keratitis is a sight-threatening condition that is usually an ocular emergency. The visual outcome depends on prompt and accurate clinical management as well as geographic and epidemiological awareness. We conducted a retrospective observational study to define the epidemiological and laboratory profile, as well as the clinical course of bacterial keratitis in a tertiary hospital in São Paulo over 21 years. Information about age, sex, predisposing factors, topical and surgical treatment, visual acuity, ulcers' classification, bacterioscopy, culture, and antibiotic sensitivity tests were collected. This study included 160 patients. The mean age was 65.1 ± 18.4 years and risk factors were identified in 83.1 % of the patients. Empirical topical fortified cephalosporin with an aminoglycoside or fourth-generation fluoroquinolone was curative for 66.2 % of the cases. The mean treatment duration was 22.5 ± 9 days. The mean variation of visual acuity was -0.25 logMAR, p < 0.001. Culture revealed 64 % of Gram-positive bacteria. All Gram-positive bacteria were sensitive to cephalothin, vancomycin, and quinolones. All Gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin. These findings reinforce the importance of prompt empirical treatment of severe corneal ulcers with a fortified cephalosporin and aminoglycoside or a fourth-generation fluoroquinolone as there are equally effective. Collected data was insufficient to evaluate resistance of ocular infections over time in this population.

Indexed as

Eye Infections, BacterialKeratitisAgedAged, 80 and overAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBrazilCephalosporinsFluoroquinolonesGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsFluoroquinolonesAntibiotic sensitivity testBacteriologyCorneal ulcerKeratitis

Identifiers

PMID37806317
PMCPMC10597823
OpenAlexW4387404483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.