Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805982›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2023

Free and Interfacial Boundaries in Individual-Based Models of Multicellular Biological systems.

Domenic P J Germano, Adriana Zanca, Stuart T Johnston, Jennifer A Flegg, James M Osborne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Domenic P J Germano *School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5893-4840
Adriana Zanca *School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5397-8526
Stuart T JohnstonSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-5573
Jennifer A FleggSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8809-726X
James M OsborneSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia. jmosborne@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-0104
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordination of cell behaviour is key to a myriad of biological processes including tissue morphogenesis, wound healing, and tumour growth. As such, individual-based computational models, which explicitly describe inter-cellular interactions, are commonly used to model collective cell dynamics. However, when using individual-based models, it is unclear how descriptions of cell boundaries affect overall population dynamics. In order to investigate this we define three cell boundary descriptions of varying complexities for each of three widely used off-lattice individual-based models: overlapping spheres, Voronoi tessellation, and vertex models. We apply our models to multiple biological scenarios to investigate how cell boundary description can influence tissue-scale behaviour. We find that the Voronoi tessellation model is most sensitive to changes in the cell boundary description with basic models being inappropriate in many cases. The timescale of tissue evolution when using an overlapping spheres model is coupled to the boundary description. The vertex model is demonstrated to be the most stable to changes in boundary description, though still exhibits timescale sensitivity. When using individual-based computational models one should carefully consider how cell boundaries are defined. To inform future work, we provide an exploration of common individual-based models and cell boundary descriptions in frequently studied biological scenarios and discuss their benefits and disadvantages.

Indexed as

Mathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalCell CommunicationMorphogenesisSoftwareCell boundariesIndividual-based modelsTissue growthWound healing

Identifiers

PMID37805982
PMCPMC10560655
OpenAlexW4387440743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.