Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805938›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2024

Comparison of computational fluid dynamics with transcranial Doppler ultrasound in response to physiological stimuli.

Harrison T Caddy, Hannah J Thomas, Lachlan J Kelsey, Kurt J Smith, Barry J Doyle, Daniel J Green

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Harrison T CaddyVascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Hannah J ThomasSchool of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Lachlan J KelseyVascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Kurt J SmithSchool of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Barry J Doyle *Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Australia and the UWA Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. barry.doyle@uwa.edu.au.
Daniel J Green *School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Sciences), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship APP1080914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrovascular haemodynamics are sensitive to multiple physiological stimuli that require synergistic response to maintain adequate perfusion. Understanding haemodynamic changes within cerebral arteries is important to inform how the brain regulates perfusion; however, methods for direct measurement of cerebral haemodynamics in these environments are challenging. The aim of this study was to assess velocity waveform metrics obtained using transcranial Doppler (TCD) with flow-conserving subject-specific three-dimensional (3D) simulations using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Twelve healthy participants underwent head and neck imaging with 3 T magnetic resonance angiography. Velocity waveforms in the middle cerebral artery were measured with TCD ultrasound, while diameter and velocity were measured using duplex ultrasound in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries to calculate incoming cerebral flow at rest, during hypercapnia and exercise. CFD simulations were developed for each condition, with velocity waveform metrics extracted in the same insonation region as TCD. Exposure to stimuli induced significant changes in cardiorespiratory measures across all participants. Measured absolute TCD velocities were significantly higher than those calculated from CFD (P range < 0.001-0.004), and these data were not correlated across conditions (r range 0.030-0.377, P range 0.227-0.925). However, relative changes in systolic and time-averaged velocity from resting levels exhibited significant positive correlations when the distinct techniques were compared (r range 0.577-0.770, P range 0.003-0.049). Our data indicate that while absolute measures of cerebral velocity differ between TCD and 3D CFD simulation, physiological changes from resting levels in systolic and time-averaged velocity are significantly correlated between techniques.

Indexed as

Cerebral ArteriesHydrodynamicsBlood Flow VelocityBrainCerebrovascular CirculationHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialCerebral vasculatureComputational fluid dynamicsStimuliTranscranial Doppler ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37805938
PMCPMC10902019
OpenAlexW4387439818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.