ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Implementation of a 7T Epilepsy Task Force consensus imaging protocol for routine presurgical epilepsy work-up: effect on diagnostic yield and lesion delineation.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
- Multimodal neuroimaging fusion in presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy: current evidence, clinical integration, and future directions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping at 7T as a biomarker of post- and interictal extravascular iron in patients with focal epilepsy.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Glutamine Metabolism and Metabolic Profiling Using 7 T CRT-FID MRSI in Focal Epilepsy.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- A closer look: pediatric neuroimaging at 7T.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Optimizing T2* imaging for adolescent and young adult patients at 7 T.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Voxel-based and surface-based cortical morphometric MRI applications for identifying the epileptogenic zone: A narrative review.Epilepsia open · 2025Review
- Ultrahigh-field imaging (7 Tesla) in DNET: Unmasking microstructural imaging characteristics - A case report.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- In vivo 9.4 Tesla MRI of a patient with drug-resistant epilepsy: Technical report.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Assessment of the available evidence for the use of 7-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neurological and musculoskeletal disorders, with comparison to 3-T and 1.5-T MRI: A systematic scoping review.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Excitatory-inhibitory imbalance in temporal lobe epilepsy: a 5T multimodal MRI biomarker for focus localization and drug resistance stratification.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Microglia in Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: A Hub in Epilepsy.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Potential applications of 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric neuroimaging: Feasibility and challenges.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
22 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecently, the 7 Tesla (7 T) Epilepsy Task Force published recommendations for 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsy in pre-surgical evaluation. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate this consensus protocol with respect to both its practicability and its diagnostic value/potential lesion delineation surplus effect over 3 T MRI in the pre-surgical work-up of patients with pharmaco-resistant focal onset epilepsy.
methodsThe 7 T MRI protocol consisted of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, high-resolution-coronal T2-weighted, fluid-suppressed, fluid-and-white-matter-suppressed, and susceptibility-weighted imaging, with an overall duration of 50 min. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated the ability of lesion identification, the detection confidence for these identified lesions, and the lesion border delineation at 7 T compared to 3 T MRI.
resultsOf 41 recruited patients > 12 years of age, 38 were successfully measured and analyzed. Mean detection confidence scores were non-significantly higher at 7 T (1.95 ± 0.84 out of 3 versus 1.64 ± 1.19 out of 3 at 3 T, p = 0.050). In 50% of epilepsy patients measured at 7 T, additional findings compared to 3 T MRI were observed. Furthermore, we found improved border delineation at 7 T in 88% of patients with 3 T-visible lesions. In 19% of 3 T MR-negative cases a new potential epileptogenic lesion was detected at 7 T.
conclusionsThe diagnostic yield was beneficial, but with 19% new 7 T over 3 T findings, not major. Our evaluation revealed epilepsy outcomes worse than ILAE Class 1 in two out of the four operated cases with new 7 T findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.