Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805665›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Implementation of a 7T Epilepsy Task Force consensus imaging protocol for routine presurgical epilepsy work-up: effect on diagnostic yield and lesion delineation.

Gilbert Hangel, Gregor Kasprian, Stefanie Chambers, Lukas Haider, Philipp Lazen, Johannes Koren, Robert Diehm, Katharina Moser, Matthias Tomschik, Jonathan Wais and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gilbert HangelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. gilbert.hangel@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-3159
Gregor KasprianDivision of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefanie ChambersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas HaiderDivision of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp LazenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes KorenDepartment of Neurology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Robert DiehmCenter for Rare and Complex Childhood Onset Epilepsies, Member of ERN EpiCARE, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina MoserCenter for Rare and Complex Childhood Onset Epilepsies, Member of ERN EpiCARE, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias TomschikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jonathan WaisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian WinterDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Vitalij ZeiserDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan GruberDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, High Field MR Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Susanne Aull-WatschingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tatjana Traub-WeidingerDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph BaumgartnerDepartment of Neurology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Martha FeuchtCenter for Rare and Complex Childhood Onset Epilepsies, Member of ERN EpiCARE, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian DorferDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang BognerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, High Field MR Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Siegfried TrattnigDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, High Field MR Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ekaterina PataraiaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karl RoesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATChristian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity · ATKlinik Hietzing · ATMRC Prion Unit · GB

Funding

Medical-Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the Federal Capital Vienna 21186Medizinische Universität Wien Neuroscience Cluster Seed Grant 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecently, the 7 Tesla (7 T) Epilepsy Task Force published recommendations for 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsy in pre-surgical evaluation. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate this consensus protocol with respect to both its practicability and its diagnostic value/potential lesion delineation surplus effect over 3 T MRI in the pre-surgical work-up of patients with pharmaco-resistant focal onset epilepsy.

methodsThe 7 T MRI protocol consisted of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, high-resolution-coronal T2-weighted, fluid-suppressed, fluid-and-white-matter-suppressed, and susceptibility-weighted imaging, with an overall duration of 50 min. Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated the ability of lesion identification, the detection confidence for these identified lesions, and the lesion border delineation at 7 T compared to 3 T MRI.

resultsOf 41 recruited patients > 12 years of age, 38 were successfully measured and analyzed. Mean detection confidence scores were non-significantly higher at 7 T (1.95 ± 0.84 out of 3 versus 1.64 ± 1.19 out of 3 at 3 T, p = 0.050). In 50% of epilepsy patients measured at 7 T, additional findings compared to 3 T MRI were observed. Furthermore, we found improved border delineation at 7 T in 88% of patients with 3 T-visible lesions. In 19% of 3 T MR-negative cases a new potential epileptogenic lesion was detected at 7 T.

conclusionsThe diagnostic yield was beneficial, but with 19% new 7 T over 3 T findings, not major. Our evaluation revealed epilepsy outcomes worse than ILAE Class 1 in two out of the four operated cases with new 7 T findings.

Indexed as

Epilepsies, PartialEpilepsyWhite MatterAdultConsensusHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging7 T Epilepsy Task Force consensus recommendation7 T MRIEpilepsyUltra-high-field

Identifiers

PMID37805665
PMCPMC10827812
OpenAlexW4387423283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.