Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805655›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2023

Identification of motor progression in Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors and machine learning.

Charalampos Sotirakis, Zi Su, Maksymilian A Brzezicki, Niall Conway, Lionel Tarassenko, James J FitzGerald, Chrystalina A Antoniades

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital Outcomes as Biomarkers of Disease Progression in Early Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Lifestyle medicine for neuroprotection: evidence and implementation in Asian contexts.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charalampos SotirakisNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-2067
Zi SuNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maksymilian A BrzezickiNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0079-4934
Niall ConwayNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lionel TarassenkoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James J FitzGeraldNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Chrystalina A AntoniadesNeuroMetrology Lab, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. chrystalina.antoniades@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1192-3834
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices offer the potential to track motor symptoms in neurological disorders. Kinematic data used together with machine learning algorithms can accurately identify people living with movement disorders and the severity of their motor symptoms. In this study we aimed to establish whether a combination of wearable sensor data and machine learning algorithms with automatic feature selection can estimate the clinical rating scale and whether it is possible to monitor the motor symptom progression longitudinally, for people with Parkinson's Disease. Seventy-four patients visited the lab seven times at 3-month intervals. Their walking (2-minutes) and postural sway (30-seconds,eyes-closed) were recorded using six Inertial Measurement Unit sensors. Simple linear regression and Random Forest algorithms were utilised together with different routines of automatic feature selection or factorisation, resulting in seven different machine learning algorithms to estimate the clinical rating scale (Movement Disorder Society- Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III; MDS-UPDRS-III). Twenty-nine features were found to significantly progress with time at group level. The Random Forest model revealed the most accurate estimation of the MDS-UPDRS-III among the seven models. The model estimations detected a statistically significant progression of the motor symptoms within 15 months when compared to the first visit, whereas the MDS-UPDRS-III did not capture any change. Wearable sensors and machine learning can track the motor symptom progression in people with PD better than the conventionally used clinical rating scales. The methods described in this study can be utilised complimentary to the clinical rating scales to improve the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy.

Identifiers

PMID37805655
PMCPMC10560243
OpenAlexW4387424974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.