Trial reportExperimental brain research2023
Normobaric hypoxia does not influence the sural nerve cutaneous reflex during standing.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of four hours of normobaric hypoxia on the vestibular control of balance.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hypoxia increases postural sway compared to normoxia, but the underlying sensorimotor factors remain unclear. An important contributor to balance control is cutaneous feedback arising from the feet, which can be partially characterized by electrically evoking a reflex from a purely cutaneous nerve (i.e., sural) and sampling the subsequent motor activity of a muscle. The purpose of the present study was to determine how normobaric hypoxia influences sural nerve reflex parameters during a standing posture. It was hypothesized that normobaric hypoxia would reduce cutaneous reflex area compared to normoxia. Participants (n = 16; 5 females, 11 males) stood with their feet together while receiving two trials of 50 sural nerve stimulations (200-Hz, 5-pulse train, presented randomly every 3-6 s) at baseline (BL; normoxia), and at 2 (H2) and 4 (H4) h of normobaric hypoxia (~ 0.11 fraction of inspired oxygen in a hypoxic chamber). The sural nerve reflex was recorded using surface electromyography from the left medial gastrocnemius, and characterized by area and duration of the initial positive and negative peaks of the response. When normalized to pre-stimulus electromyography, the area of the peak-to-peak cutaneous reflex was not different than BL (p ≥ 0.14) for up to 4 h of normobaric hypoxia (BL: 0.26 ± 0.22, H2: 0.19 ± 0.19, H4: 0.22 ± 0.20 A.U.). Furthermore, the duration of the response was not different during hypoxia (BL: 73.2 ± 42.4; H2: 75.2 ± 47.0; H4: 77.6 ± 54.6 ms; p ≥ 0.13) than BL. Thus, reflexes arising from cutaneous afferents of the lateral border of the foot are resilient to at least 4 h of normobaric hypoxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.