Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805552›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Spatial differences influence nitrogen uptake, grain yield, and land-use advantage of wheat/soybean relay intercropping systems.

Muhammad Ali Raza, Atta Mohi Ud Din, Wang Zhiqi, Hina Gul, Sana Ur Rehman, Birra Bukhari, Imran Haider, Muhammad Habib Ur Rahman, Xue Liang, Shuanglong Luo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Muhammad Ali Raza *Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Atta Mohi Ud Din *National Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Wang Zhiqi *Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Hina Gul *National Center for Industrial Biotechnology, Arid Agricultural University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Sana Ur RehmanNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Birra BukhariCollege of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Imran HaiderNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Muhammad Habib Ur RahmanDepartment of Seed Science and Technology, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.
Xue LiangGansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Shuanglong LuoGansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Ayman El SabaghDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.
Ruijun QinHermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA. ruijun.qin@oregonstate.edu.
Ma ZhongmingGansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China. mazhming@gsagr.cn.
Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKOregon State University · USPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKSiirt Üniversitesi · TRSouth China Agricultural University · CNThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cereal/legume intercropping is becoming a popular production strategy for higher crop yields and net profits with reduced inputs and environmental impact. However, the effects of different spatial arrangements on the growth, grain yield, nitrogen uptake, and land-use advantage of wheat/soybean relay intercropping are still unclear, particularly under arid irrigated conditions. Therefore, in a three-year field study from 2018 to 2021, soybean was relay intercropped with wheat in different crop configurations (0.9 m, narrow strips; 1.8 m, medium strips; and 2.7 m, wide strips), and the results of intercropping systems were compared with their sole systems. Results revealed that intercrops with wide strips outperformed the narrow and medium strips, when the objective was to obtain higher total leaf area, dry matter, nitrogen uptake, and grain yield on a given land area due to reduced interspecific competition between intercrops. Specifically, at maturity, wide strips increased the dry matter accumulation (37% and 58%) and its distribution in roots (37% and 55%), straw (40% and 61%), and grains (30% and 46%) of wheat and soybean, respectively, compared to narrow strips. This enhanced dry matter in wide strips improved the soybean's competitive ability (by 17%) but reduced the wheat's competitive ability (by 12%) compared with narrow strips. Noticeably, all intercropping systems accumulated a significantly higher amount of nitrogen than sole systems, revealing that wheat/soybean relay intercropping requires fewer anthropogenic inputs (nitrogen) and exerts less pressure on the ecosystem than sole systems. Overall, in wide strips, intercropped wheat and soybean achieved 62% and 71% of sole wheat and soybean yield, respectively, which increased the greater total system yield (by 19%), total land equivalent ratio (by 24%), and net profit (by 34%) of wide strips compared to narrow strips. Our study, therefore, implies that the growth parameters, grain yields, nutrient accumulation, and land-use advantage of intercrop species could be improved with the proper spatial arrangement in cereal/legume intercropping systems.

Indexed as

AgricultureEdible GrainCrops, AgriculturalEcosystemGlycine maxNitrogenTriticumZea maysNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID37805552
PMCPMC10560251
OpenAlexW4387426043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.