Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805540›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Bayesian learning from multi-way EEG feedback for robot navigation and target identification.

Christopher Wirth, Jake Toth, Mahnaz Arvaneh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher WirthAutomatic Control and Systems Engineering Department, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK. christopher.wirth@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1800-0899
Jake TothAutomatic Control and Systems Engineering Department, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.
Mahnaz ArvanehAutomatic Control and Systems Engineering Department, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many brain-computer interfaces require a high mental workload. Recent research has shown that this could be greatly alleviated through machine learning, inferring user intentions via reactive brain responses. These signals are generated spontaneously while users merely observe assistive robots performing tasks. Using reactive brain signals, existing studies have addressed robot navigation tasks with a very limited number of potential target locations. Moreover, they use only binary, error-vs-correct classification of robot actions, leaving more detailed information unutilised. In this study a virtual robot had to navigate towards, and identify, target locations in both small and large grids, wherein any location could be the target. For the first time, we apply a system utilising detailed EEG information: 4-way classification of movements is performed, including specific information regarding when the target is reached. Additionally, we classify whether targets are correctly identified. Our proposed Bayesian strategy infers the most likely target location from the brain's responses. The experimental results show that our novel use of detailed information facilitates a more efficient and robust system than the state-of-the-art. Furthermore, unlike state-of-the-art approaches, we show scalability of our proposed approach: By tuning parameters appropriately, our strategy correctly identifies 98% of targets, even in large search spaces.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesNeurofeedbackRoboticsBayes TheoremBrainElectroencephalography

Identifiers

PMID37805540
PMCPMC10560278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.