Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805486›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

A blended module (STAIRS) to promote functional and personal recovery in patients with a major depressive disorder in remission: study protocol of a concurrent mixed methods randomized controlled trial.

David Wedema, Klaas J Wardenaar, Manna A Alma, Antoinette D I van Asselt, Eliza L Korevaar, Robert A Schoevers

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05440812 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Newly Developed Blended Module for Patients Recovering From Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05440812 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Newly Developed Blended Module for Patients Recovering From Depression (STAIRS): a Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2022 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsDepressionArmsStorytelling and Training to Advance Individual Recovery Skills (STAIRS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David WedemaResearch and Innovation Centre for Rehabilitation, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands. d.wedema@umcg.nl.
Klaas J WardenaarDepartment of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Manna A AlmaDepartment of Health Sciences, Applied Health Research, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Antoinette D I van AsseltDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eliza L KorevaarResearch and Innovation Centre for Rehabilitation, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robert A SchoeversDepartment of Psychiatry, Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences (BCN), University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the availability of a wide variety of evidence-based treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD), many patients still experience impairments in their lives after remission. Programs are needed that effectively support patients in coping with these impairments. The program Storytelling and Training to Advance Individual Recovery Skills (STAIRS) was developed to address this need and combines the use of peer contact, expert-by-experience guidance, family support and professional blended care. The aim of the planned study is (1) to assess the efficacy of the STAIRS program in patients with remitted MDD, (2) to investigate patients' subjective experiences with STAIRS, and (3) to evaluate the program's cost-effectiveness.

methodsA concurrent mixed-methods randomized controlled trial design will be used. Patients aged between 18 and 65 years with remitted MDD (N = 140) will be randomized to either a group receiving care as usual (CAU) + the STAIRS-program or a control group receiving CAU + some basic psychoeducation. Quantitative efficacy data on functional and personal recovery and associated aspects will be collected using self-report questionnaires at the start of the intervention, immediately following the intervention, and at the six-month follow-up. Insights into patients' experiences on perceived effects and the way in which different program elements contribute to this effect, as well as the usability and acceptability of the program, will be gained by conducting qualitative interviews with patients from the experimental group, who are selected using maximum variation sampling. Finally, data on healthcare resource use, productivity loss and quality of life will be collected and analysed to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the STAIRS-program. DISCUSSION: Well-designed recovery-oriented programs for patients suffering from MDD are scarce. If efficacy and cost-effectiveness are demonstrated with this study and patients experience the STAIRS program as usable and acceptable, this program can be a valuable addition to CAU. The qualitative interviews may give insights into what works for whom, which can be used to promote implementation.

trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 1 July 2021, registration number NCT05440812.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignYoung AdultBlended careDepressionExpert by experienceFunctional recoveryPeer groupPersonal recoveryRecovery-oriented careSocial support

Identifiers

PMID37805486
PMCPMC10560411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.