Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805475›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Quality of reporting and trends of emergency obstetric and neonatal care indicators: an analysis from Tanzania district health information system data between 2016 and 2020.

Josephine Shabani, Honorati Masanja, Sophia Kagoye, Jacqueline Minja, Shraddha Bajaria, Yeromin Mlacha, Sia Msuya, Mahundi Masoud, Daudi Simba, Andrea B Pembe and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BMJ global health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Josephine ShabaniIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. jshabani@ihi.or.tz.
Honorati MasanjaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sophia KagoyeNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Jacqueline MinjaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Shraddha BajariaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Yeromin MlachaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sia MsuyaKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.
Mahundi MasoudUniversity of Dar es Salaam, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Daudi SimbaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Andrea B PembeMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ahmad Mohamed MakuwaniMinistry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Habib IsmailMinistry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Maro ChachaMinistry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Claud KumalijaMinistry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Ties BoermaUniversity of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada.
Claudia HansonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Post-Doctoral Fellowship Training in HIV Clinical InvestigationD43TW011826 · FIC · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Daniel W Fitzgerald, Saidi Kapiga · 2021 to 2026
$1.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine health facility data provides the opportunity to monitor progress in quality and uptake of health care continuously. Our study aimed to assess the reliability and usefulness of emergency obstetric care data including temporal and regional variations over the past five years in Tanzania Mainland.

methodsData were compiled from the routine monthly district reports compiled as part of the health management information systems for 2016-2020. Key indicators for maternal and neonatal care coverage, emergency obstetric and neonatal complications, and interventions indicators were computed. Assessment on reliability and consistency of reports was conducted and compared with annual rates and proportions over time, across the 26 regions in of Tanzania Mainland and by institutional delivery coverage.

resultsFacility reporting was near complete with 98% in 2018-2020. Estimated population coverage of institutional births increased by 10% points from 71.2% to 2016 to 81.7% in 2020 in Tanzania Mainland, driven by increased use of dispensaries and health centres compared to hospitals. This trend was more pronounced in regions with lower institutional birth rates. The Caesarean section rate remained stable at around 10% of institutional births. Trends in the occurrence of complications such as antepartum haemorrhage, premature rupture of membranes, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or post-partum bleeding were consistent over time but at low levels (1% of institutional births). Prophylactic uterotonics were provided to nearly all births while curative uterotonics were reported to be used in less than 10% of post-partum bleeding and retained placenta cases.

conclusionOur results show a mixed picture in terms of usefulness of the District Health Information System(DHIS2) data. Key indicators of institutional delivery and Caesarean section rates were plausible and provide useful information on regional disparities and trends. However, obstetric complications and several interventions were underreported thus diminishing the usefulness of these data for monitoring. Further research is needed on why complications and interventions to address them are not documented reliably.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsPostpartum HemorrhageCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsTanzaniaDistrict Health Information SystemEmergency obstetric careEmONC interventionsIndicatorsInstitutional deliveriesObstetric complications

Identifiers

PMID37805475
PMCPMC10559477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.