Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805472›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023

Informing efforts beyond tailored promotional campaigns by understanding contextual factors shaping vaccine hesitancy among equity-deserving populations in Canada: an exploratory qualitative study.

Lena G Nascimento, Ève Dubé, Kathleen E Burns, Patrick Brown, Michael Calnan, Paul R Ward, Eric Filice, Hoda Herati, Nnenna A U Ike, Bobbi Rotolo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lena G NascimentoUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Ève DubéInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Kathleen E BurnsUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Patrick BrownUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael CalnanUniversity of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Paul R WardTorrens University, Adelaide, Australia.
Eric FiliceUnity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Hoda HeratiUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Nnenna A U IkeUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Bobbi RotoloUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Samantha B MeyerUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. samantha.meyer@uwaterloo.ca.

Funding

CIHR Grant # 466769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy exists on a continuum ranging between complete adherence and complete refusal due to doubts or concerns within a heterogeneous group of individuals. Despite widespread acknowledgement of the contextual factors influencing attitudes and beliefs shaping COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, qualitative research with equity-deserving groups, accounting for unique lived experiences, remains a gap in the literature. We aim to identify and begin to understand and document the unique contextual factors shaping hesitancy by equity-deserving groups as it relates to relationships with government and health authorities.

methodsParticipants were recruited and interviewed between Aug-Dec 2021. Semi-structured interviews using a convergent interviewing technique were conducted with individuals from the general population, as well as individuals who identify as First Nations, Métis, or Inuit, members of the LGBT2SQ + community, low-income Canadians, Black Canadians, and newcomers. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed by a team of researchers. Memos were written following interviews and used to complement the thematic analysis of the interview data. Themes are presented in the results section.

resultsThe rationale for hesitancy among equity-deserving groups is consistent with literature documenting hesitancy in the general population. Contextual factors surrounding equity-deserving groups' attitudes and beliefs, however, are unique and relate to a history of oppression, discrimination, and genocide. We identified factors unique to subgroups; for example, religious or fatalistic beliefs among participant who identify as FNMI, fear associated with lack of testing and speed of vaccines' production among participants who identify as FNMI, Black, and LGBT2SQ + , distrust of the healthcare system for LGBT2SQ + and Black Canadians, and distrust of the government and opposition to vaccine mandates for participating who identify as LGBT2SQ + , low-income, FNMI, or Black Canadian. Newcomers stood out as very trusting of the government and accepting of COVID-19 vaccination.

conclusionsWhile our data on vaccine hesitancy largely mirror concerns reported in the vast body of literature citing rationale for COVID-19 hesitancy in high-income countries, the contextual factors identified in our work point to the need for wider systemic change. Our results may be used to support efforts, beyond tailored promotion campaigns, to support the confident acceptance of vaccines for COVID-19 and the acceptance of novel vaccines as future infectious diseases emerge.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCanadaGovernmentHumansVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCanadaContextual factorsCOVID-19Equity-deserving groupsMarginalized groupsPromotional campaignsQualitativeVaccine confidenceVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37805472
PMCPMC10559625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.