Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805385›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2023

Seeing social interactions.

Emalie McMahon, Leyla Isik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A reverse hierarchy theory of social perception.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Processing Stages for Social Interaction Recognition.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  15. Shared and Individual Tuning Curves for Social Perception.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Social Decision Preferences for Close Others Are Embedded in Neural and Linguistic Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emalie McMahonDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leyla IsikDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: lisik@jhu.edu.

Funding

The neural computations underlying human social interaction recognitionR01MH132826 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Leyla Isik · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH132826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seeing the interactions between other people is a critical part of our everyday visual experience, but recognizing the social interactions of others is often considered outside the scope of vision and grouped with higher-level social cognition like theory of mind. Recent work, however, has revealed that recognition of social interactions is efficient and automatic, is well modeled by bottom-up computational algorithms, and occurs in visually-selective regions of the brain. We review recent evidence from these three methodologies (behavioral, computational, and neural) that converge to suggest the core of social interaction perception is visual. We propose a computational framework for how this process is carried out in the brain and offer directions for future interdisciplinary investigations of social perception.

Indexed as

Social InteractionSocial PerceptionBrainCognitionHumanscognitive neurosciencecomputational cognitive sciencesocial interactionsvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID37805385
PMCPMC10841760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.