Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37805117›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2023

Sex difference in the facilitation of fear learning by prior fear conditioning.

Kehinde E Cole, Ryan G Parsons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kehinde E ColeStony Brook University, Department of Psychology, 100 Nicolls Rd., Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States.
Ryan G ParsonsStony Brook University, Department of Psychology, 100 Nicolls Rd., Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States. Electronic address: ryan.parsons@stonybrook.edu.

Funding

Ion Channel Plasticity and Aversive Memory PrimingR21MH121772 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PARSONS, RYAN G · 2020 to 2020
$439k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH121772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is now ample evidence that the strength and underlying mechanisms of memory formation can be drastically altered by prior experience. However, the prior work using rodent models on this topic has used only males as subjects, and as a result, we do know whether or not the effects of prior experience on subsequent learning are similar in both sexes. As a first step towards addressing this shortcoming, rats of both sexes were given auditory fear conditioning, or fear conditioning with unsignaled shocks, followed an hour or a day later by a single pairing of light and shock. Fear memory for each experience was assessed by measuring freezing behavior to the auditory cue and fear-potentiated startle to the light. Results showed that males trained with auditory fear conditioning showed facilitated learning to the subsequent visual fear conditioning session when the two training sessions were separated by one hour or one day. Females showed evidence of facilitation in rats given auditory conditioning when they were spaced by an hour but not when they were spaced by one day. Contextual fear conditioning did not support the facilitation of subsequent learning under any conditions. These results indicate that the mechanism by which prior fear conditioning facilitates subsequent learning differs between sexes, and they set the stage for mechanistic studies to understand the neurobiological basis of this sex difference.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalSex CharacteristicsAnimalsConditioning, PsychologicalFearFemaleHumansLearningMaleRatsAllocationFearLearningMemoryMetaplasticitySex differenceTagging

Identifiers

PMID37805117
PMCPMC12998617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.