ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Improved left atrial catheterization efficiency and consistency using a novel steerable transseptal puncture sheath.
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crossing the Septum: Step-by-Step Anatomy, Technique, and Enabling Technologies in Transseptal Puncture for Atrial Fibrillation and Electrophysiological Procedures.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Improved left atrial catheterization efficiency and consistency using a novel steerable transseptal puncture sheath.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile steerable sheaths are widely used to improve catheter stability and contact force during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), steerable sheaths are less commonly used during transseptal puncture. This study evaluated whether left atrial catheterization efficiency can be improved using the VersaCross combined steerable sheath and transseptal system compared to previous standard workflow.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed AF ablation performed using the VersaCross Workflow consisting of VersaCross steerable sheath and RF wire for transseptal puncture and catheter ablation (VCW) to the standard workflow using a fixed curve sheath with RF needle followed by exchange for an Agilis steerable sheath for catheter ablation (STW).
resultsThirty patients underwent RF ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF, 15 using the VCW and 15 using the STW. Transseptal puncture time was 10.8 mins faster with the VCW compared to the standard workflow (20.9 ± 5.9 min vs. 31.7 ± 15.1 min; p = 0.024). Time to left atrial catheterization was 40% faster with the VCW compared to the STW (21.3 ± 5.8 min vs. 35.2 ± 14.4 min; p = 0.003). Overall procedure time was 14.2 min faster in the VCW compared to the STW (86.3 ± 16.1 min vs. 100.5 ± 19.3 min; p = 0.044).
conclusionsUse of the VersaCross steerable system significantly reduced time to transseptal puncture, time to left atrial catheterization, and overall RF ablation time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.