ArticleRadiological physics and technology2023
Verification of optimal conditions for the scattering correction of
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify the optimal scattering correction for 123I-FP-CIT SPECT (DAT-SPECT) using a two-detector whole-body cadmium-zinc-telluride semiconductor detector (C-SPECT) system with a medium-energy high-resolution sensitivity (MEHRS) collimator. The C-SPECT system with the MEHRS collimator assessed image quality and quantification using a striated phantom. Different reconstruction methods and scattering correction settings were compared, including filtered back projection (FBP) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM). Higher %contrast and %CV values were observed > 10% subwindow (SW) for all conditions, with no significant differences between images without scattering correction and those < 7% SW. The FBP images show a greater increase in %CV > 10% SW than the OSEM images. The specific binding ratio in the radioactivity ratio of 8:1 was higher than the true value under all conditions. The C-SPECT system with an MEHRS collimator provided accurate scattering suppression and enabled high-quality imaging for DAT-SPECT. Careful setting of the scattering correction is essential for total count accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37804463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.