ArticleEndocrine2024
Changes in the outcomes of patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma over the past two decades.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the changes in survival outcomes among patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in the US over the past two decades.
methodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database research data were reviewed, and patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, who were diagnosed from 2004 to 2020 were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were conducted to examine differences in overall survival between three year-of-diagnosis groups (2004 to 2010; 2011 to 2016; and 2017 to 2020). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was then performed to explore the factors affecting overall survival.
resultsA total of 1804 patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma were included. Using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, overall survival was better among patients diagnosed from 2017 to 2020 versus those diagnosed at earlier periods (P < 0.001). One-year survival estimates were 25% among patients diagnosed from 2017 to 2020 versus 15% for patients diagnosed from 2011 to 2016, and 19%, for patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2010. Using the multivariable Cox regression model, an earlier year of diagnosis was associated with worse overall survival compared to the diagnosis year 2017 to 2020 (HR for diagnosis 2004 to 2010 versus diagnosis 2017 to 2020: 1.170; 95% CI: 1.029 to 1.331, and HR for diagnosis 2011 to 2016 versus diagnosis 2017 to 2020: 1.251; 95% CI: 1.103 to 1.419).
conclusionsWhile anaplastic thyroid carcinoma remains a deadly cancer, survival seems to be improving for the last few years compared to earlier years. There is still additional work to be done to improve the outcomes of those patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37804443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.