ArticleBrain structure & function2023
Improved Functionnectome by dissociating the contributions of white matter fiber classes to functional activation.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical white matter tracts span the cortical hierarchy to support cognitive diversity.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Anatomical White Matter Tracts Span the Cortical Hierarchy to Support Cognitive Diversity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Functional anatomy and topographical organization of the frontotemporal arcuate fasciculus.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Track-Weighted Dynamic Functional Connectivity Profiles and Topographic Organization of the Human Pulvinar.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Streams of conscious visual experience.Communications biology · 2024Article
- A practical guide for combining functional regions of interest and white matter bundles.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating the underlying brain circuit's structural and functional architecture is required to explore the functional organization of cognitive networks. In that regard, we recently introduced the Functionnectome. This structural-functional method combines an fMRI acquisition with tractography-derived white matter connectivity data to map cognitive processes onto the white matter. However, this multimodal integration faces three significant challenges: (1) the necessarily limited overlap between tractography streamlines and the grey matter, which may reduce the amount of functional signal associated with the related structural connectivity; (2) the scrambling effect of crossing fibers on functional signal, as a single voxel in such regions can be structurally connected to several cognitive networks with heterogeneous functional signals; and (3) the difficulty of interpretation of the resulting cognitive maps, as crossing and overlapping white matter tracts can obscure the organization of the studied network. In the present study, we tackled these problems by developing a streamline-extension procedure and dividing the white matter anatomical priors between association, commissural, and projection fibers. This approach significantly improved the characterization of the white matter involvement in the studied cognitive processes. The new Functionnectome priors produced are now readily available, and the analysis workflow highlighted here should also be generalizable to other structural-functional approaches. We improved the Functionnectome approach to better study the involvement of white matter in brain function by separating the analysis of the three classes of white matter fibers (association, commissural, and projection fibers). This step successfully clarified the activation maps and increased their statistical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37804431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.