Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37804425›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Financial toxicity among cancer survivors: a conceptual model based on a feedback perspective.

Alexander Scheidegger, Daniela Bernhardsgrütter, Andrea Kobleder, Martin Müller, Karen Nestor, Ernst Richle, Eleonore Baum

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander ScheideggerOstschweizer Fachhochschule, Oberseestrasse 10, 8640, Rapperswil, Switzerland. alexander.scheidegger@ost.ch.
Daniela BernhardsgrütterOstschweizer Fachhochschule, Oberseestrasse 10, 8640, Rapperswil, Switzerland.
Andrea KoblederOstschweizer Fachhochschule, Oberseestrasse 10, 8640, Rapperswil, Switzerland.
Martin MüllerOstschweizer Fachhochschule, Oberseestrasse 10, 8640, Rapperswil, Switzerland.
Karen NestorKantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ernst RichleKrebsliga Ostschweiz, Flurhofstrasse 7, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Eleonore BaumOstschweizer Fachhochschule, Oberseestrasse 10, 8640, Rapperswil, Switzerland.
Ostschweizer Fachhochschule OST · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHSwiss Cancer League · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExperiencing financial toxicity following a cancer diagnosis is a circular and complex process. We investigate the circular causal mechanisms that either reinforce or balance financial toxicity dynamics.

methodsWe conducted a literature review, expert interviews, a participatory modeling process, and exploratory interviews with N = 11 adults with cancer living in Switzerland. We sampled participants purposively based on health-related and sociodemographic characteristics.

resultsWe describe a conceptual model based on the triangulation of cancer survivor narratives, expert perspectives, and a literature review. This model distinguishes between the reinforcing and balancing feedback loops that drive the dynamics of financial toxicity. It includes the topics "Coping with cancer and employment," "Coping with limited economic resources," and "Maintaining care resources while facing economic pressure." For each topic, we identify a necessary condition for cancer survivors to avoid reinforcing financial toxicity.

conclusionsThe results allow us to reconstruct participant narratives regarding cancer-related financial toxicity. Based on comparison with scientific literature from Western Europe and North America, we hypothesize the validity of the model beyond the population covered by the sample. The results highlight the importance of screening for the risk of financial toxicity in the clinical context and individual risk and resource assessment in social counseling. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These results can raise cancer survivors' awareness of risks related to financial toxicity and strengthen their resources for coping with financial burden successfully.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdultEmploymentFeedbackFinancial StressHumansCancerEconomic impactFinancial toxicityParticipatory modelingPatient perspectivesSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID37804425
PMCPMC10560155
OpenAlexW4387426574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.