Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37804394›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Performance of a multidisciplinary robotic surgery program at a university hospital (2012-2022).

Miguel Sanchez-Encinas, Juan Rey-Biel, David Alias, Rosario Noguero-Meseguer, José Granell, Ignacio Muguruza, Antonio Herrero, Jose Luis Ayala, Raquel Barba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Sanchez-EncinasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-8278
Juan Rey-BielResearch Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-481X
David AliasDepartment of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7104-1959
Rosario Noguero-MeseguerResearch Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-402X
José GranellDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-3336
Ignacio MuguruzaResearch Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-9263
Antonio HerreroResearch Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2873-4842
Jose Luis AyalaResearch Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4825-2926
Raquel BarbaInternational Doctorate School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933, Madrid, Spain. raquel.barba@hospitalreyjuancarlos.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1408-1441
Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has become widely adopted for its ability to expand the indications for minimally invasive procedures. This technology aims to improve precision, accuracy, and outcomes while reducing complications, blood loss, and recovery time. Successful implementation of a robotic surgery program requires careful initial design and a focus on maintenance and expansion to maximize its benefits. This article presents a comprehensive study conducted at a University Hospital on the robotic surgery program from December 2012 to December 2022. Data from hospital databases, including patient demographics, surgical department, surgical time, operating room occupancy, and primary diagnosis, were analyzed. The analysis covered various time periods (surgical sessions, weeks, months, and years) to assess the program's evolution over time. Over the 10-year period, a total of 1847 robotic-assisted interventions were performed across five surgical services. Urology accounted for 57% of the cases, general surgery 17%, gynecology 16%, otorhinolaryngology 6%, and thoracic surgery 4%. The most frequently performed procedures included robotic prostatectomies (643 cases), hysterectomies (261 cases), and colposacropexies (210 cases). The weekly volume of interventions showed a notable increase, rising from 2 cases per week in 2013-2014 cases in 2022. Moreover, the average surgical duration per intervention exhibited a progressive decrease from 275 min in 2013 to 184 min in 2022. This study highlights the potential of a well-managed robotic surgery program as a viable alternative to conventional surgical approaches. Effective coordination and resource utilization contribute to the program's efficiency. The findings underscore the successful integration of robotic-assisted surgery in diverse surgical specialties.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpecialties, SurgicalFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansHysterectomyDesignOperative timeRobotic programRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37804394
OpenAlexW4387425307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.