ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2024
Next-Generation Sequencing in Unexplained Intellectual Disability.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic and clinical utility of exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in children with GDD/iD: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Unexplained Intellectual Disability: Diagnostic Workflow Moving Towards "Exome Sequencing First Approach"?Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the diagnostic yield of next generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with moderate/severe/profound intellectual disability (ID) unexplained by conventional tests and to assess the impact of definitive diagnosis on the clinical management and genetic counselling of these families.
methodsThis was a ambi-directional study conducted at Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. The study comprised 227 patients (prospective cohort - 126, retrospective cohort - 101) in whom NGS based tests were performed.
resultsThe mean age of study cohort was 4.5 ± 4.4 y (2.5 mo to 37.3 y). The male: female ratio was 1.6:1. The overall diagnostic yield of NGS was 53.3% (121/227) with causative variants identified in 84 known ID genes. Autosomal recessive intellectual disability (ARID) (23.3%, 53/227) was the most common followed by autosomal dominant intellectual disability (ADID) (20.7%, 47/227) and X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) (9.2%, 21/227). The diagnostic yield was notably higher for ID plus associated condition group (55.6% vs. 20%) (p = 0.0075, Fisher's exact test) compared to isolated ID group. The impact of diagnosis on active or long-term management was observed in 17/121 (14%) and on reproductive outcomes in 26/121 (21.4%) families.
conclusionsThere is paucity of data on molecular genetic spectrum of ID from India. The current study identifies extensive genetic heterogeneity and the impact of NGS in patients with ID unexplained by standard genetic tests. The study identified ARID as the most common cause of ID with additional implications for reproductive outcomes. It reiterates the importance of phenotype in genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37804371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.