Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37804197›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023

Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Carotid Endarterectomy Using Machine Learning.

Ben Li, Raj Verma, Derek Beaton, Hani Tamim, Mohamad A Hussain, Jamal J Hoballah, Douglas S Lee, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Will obesity break your heart - cardiac biomarkers in the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ben LiDepartment of Surgery University of Toronto Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7191-1034
Raj VermaSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences Dublin Ireland.
Derek BeatonData Science & Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto University of Toronto Canada.
Hani TamimFaculty of Medicine, Clinical Research Institute American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon.
Mohamad A HussainDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-8167
Jamal J HoballahDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon.
Douglas S LeeDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health Network Toronto Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-745X
Duminda N WijeysunderaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5897-8605
Charles de MestralDepartment of Surgery University of Toronto Canada.
Muhammad MamdaniInstitute of Medical Science University of Toronto Canada.
Mohammed Al-OmranDepartment of Surgery University of Toronto Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-0420
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAAlfaisal University · SAAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a major vascular operation for stroke prevention that carries significant perioperative risks; however, outcome prediction tools remain limited. The authors developed machine learning algorithms to predict outcomes following CEA. Methods and Results The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent CEA between 2011 and 2021. Input features included 36 preoperative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death). The data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using preoperative features. The primary metric for evaluating model performance was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Model robustness was evaluated with calibration plot and Brier score. Overall, 38 853 patients underwent CEA during the study period. Thirty-day major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 1683 (4.3%) patients. The best performing prediction model was XGBoost, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90-0.92). In comparison, logistic regression had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.64), and existing tools in the literature demonstrate area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values ranging from 0.58 to 0.74. The calibration plot showed good agreement between predicted and observed event probabilities with a Brier score of 0.02. The strongest predictive feature in our algorithm was carotid symptom status. Conclusions The machine learning models accurately predicted 30-day outcomes following CEA using preoperative data and performed better than existing tools. They have potential for important utility in guiding risk-mitigation strategies to improve outcomes for patients being considered for CEA.

Indexed as

Endarterectomy, CarotidStrokeHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomecarotid endarterectomymachine learningmajor adverse cardiovascular eventprediction

Identifiers

PMID37804197
PMCPMC10757546
OpenAlexW4387425812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.