Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37804097›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction update2024

Ultrasonographic criteria in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.

Jeffrey Pea, Jahnay Bryan, Cynthia Wan, Alexis L Oldfield, Kiran Ganga, Faith E Carter, Lynn M Johnson, Marla E Lujan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction update, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicineFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey PeaHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jahnay BryanHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Cynthia WanHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Alexis L OldfieldHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-3514
Kiran GangaHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Faith E CarterHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Lynn M JohnsonCornell Statistical Consulting Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Marla E LujanHuman Metabolic Research Unit, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Colleges of Human Ecology and Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-5814

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Relevance of polycystic ovarian morphology in the clinical evaluation of PCOSR01HD093748 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LUJAN, MARLA E · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
TRAINING IN MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITIONT32HD087137 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Bellows, Julia L. Finkelstein · 2016 to 2026
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093748NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD087137NIH HHS R01HD093748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycystic ovary morphology (PCOM) on ultrasonography is considered as a cardinal feature of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Its relevance as a diagnostic criterion for PCOS was reaffirmed in the most recent International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. However, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the best practices and specific ultrasonographic markers to define PCOM. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The aim of this systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of various ultrasonographic features of ovarian morphology in the diagnosis of PCOS. SEARCH

methodsRelevant studies published from 1 January 1990 to 12 June 2023 were identified by a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL. Studies that generated diagnostic accuracy measures (e.g. proposed thresholds, sensitivity, specificity) for PCOS using the following ultrasonographic markers met criteria for inclusion: follicle number per ovary (FNPO) or per single cross-section (FNPS), ovarian volume (OV), and stromal features. Studies on pregnant or post-menopausal women were excluded. Risk of bias and applicability assessment for diagnostic test accuracy studies were determined using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tool for a single index test or between multiple index tests, respectively. Diagnostic meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate model of pooled sensitivity and specificity, and visualized using forest plots and summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves. OUTCOMES: From a total of 2197 records initially identified, 31 studies were included. Data from five and two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to duplicate study populations or limited data for the index test, leaving 24 studies. Pooled results of 20 adult studies consisted of 3883 control participants and 3859 individuals with PCOS. FNPO was the most accurate diagnostic marker (sensitivity: 84%, CI: 81-87%; specificity: 91%, CI: 86-94%; AUC: 0.905) in adult women. OV and FNPS had similar pooled sensitivities (OV: 81%, CI: 76-86%; FNPS: 81%, CI: 70-89%) but inferior pooled specificities (OV: 81%, CI: 75-86%; FNPS: 83%, CI: 75-88%) and AUCs (OV: 0.856; FNPS: 0.870) compared to FNPO. Pooled results from four adolescent studies consisting of 210 control participants and 268 girls with PCOS suggested that OV may be a robust ultrasonographic marker for PCOS diagnosis albeit the current evidence remains limited. The majority of the studies had high risk of bias for the patient selection (e.g. lack of randomized/consecutive patient selection) and index test (e.g. lack of pre-proposed thresholds for comparison) domains across all ultrasonographic markers. As such, diagnostic meta-analysis was unable to determine the most accurate cutoff for ultrasonographic markers to diagnose PCOS. Subgroup analysis suggested that stratification based on previously proposed diagnostic thresholds, age, BMI, or technology did not account for the heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy observed across the studies. Studies that diagnosed PCOS using the Rotterdam criteria had improved sensitivity for FNPO. Studies from North America had lower diagnostic accuracy when compared to Asian studies (FNPO: sensitivity) and European studies (OV: specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and positive likelihood ratio). Geographic differences in diagnostic accuracy may potentially be due to differences in age, BMI, and diagnostic criteria of the PCOS group across regions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: This diagnostic meta-analysis supports the use of FNPO as the gold standard in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of PCOS in adult women. OV and FNPS provide alternatives if total antral follicle counts cannot be accurately obtained. Our findings support the potential for ultrasonographic evidence of PCOM in adolescents as more data becomes available. Subgroup analysis suggests the need to investigate any relative contributions of geographical differences on PCOS phenotypes. These findings may provide the basis for the development of strategies and best practices toward a standardized definition of PCOM and a more accurate ultrasonographic evaluation of PCOS.

Indexed as

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansOvarian FollicleSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographydiagnostic imagingovarian follicleovarypolycystic ovary syndromeultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37804097
PMCPMC10762001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.