Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803478›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2023

Assessment of technical and clinical utility of a bead-based flow cytometry platform for multiparametric phenotyping of CNS-derived extracellular vesicles.

Alexandra Brahmer, Carsten Geiß, Andriani Lygeraki, Elmo Neuberger, Theophilos Tzaridis, Tinh Thi Nguyen, Felix Luessi, Anne Régnier-Vigouroux, Gunther Hartmann, Perikles Simon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. On the road: extracellular vesicles in intercellular communication.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra BrahmerCellular Neurobiology, Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. albrahme@uni-mainz.de.
Carsten GeißInstitute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Andriani LygerakiCellular Neurobiology, Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Elmo NeubergerDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Institute of Sports Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Theophilos TzaridisDivision of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen- Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf, Partner Site Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Tinh Thi NguyenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Felix LuessiDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anne Régnier-VigourouxInstitute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Gunther HartmannInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Perikles SimonDepartment of Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Institute of Sports Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Kristina EndresDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Stefan BittnerDepartment of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) and Immunotherapy (FZI), Rhine Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Katrin S ReinersInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Eva-Maria Krämer-AlbersCellular Neurobiology, Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. alberse@uni-mainz.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) originating from the central nervous system (CNS) can enter the blood stream and carry molecules characteristic of disease states. Therefore, circulating CNS-derived EVs have the potential to serve as liquid-biopsy markers for early diagnosis and follow-up of neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumors. Monitoring and profiling of CNS-derived EVs using multiparametric analysis would be a major advance for biomarker as well as basic research. Here, we explored the performance of a multiplex bead-based flow-cytometry assay (EV Neuro) for semi-quantitative detection of CNS-derived EVs in body fluids.

methodsEVs were separated from culture of glioblastoma cell lines (LN18, LN229, NCH82) and primary human astrocytes and measured at different input amounts in the MACSPlex EV Kit Neuro, human. In addition, EVs were separated from blood samples of small cohorts of glioblastoma (GB), multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's disease patients as well as healthy controls (HC) and subjected to the EV Neuro assay. To determine statistically significant differences between relative marker signal intensities, an unpaired samples t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were computed. Data were subjected to tSNE, heatmap clustering, and correlation analysis to further explore the relationships between disease state and EV Neuro data.

resultsGlioblastoma cell lines and primary human astrocytes showed distinct EV profiles. Signal intensities were increasing with higher EV input. Data normalization improved identification of markers that deviate from a common profile. Overall, patient blood-derived EV marker profiles were constant, but individual EV populations were significantly increased in disease compared to healthy controls, e.g. CD36

conclusionsThe semi-quantitative EV Neuro assay demonstrated its utility for EV profiling in complex samples. However, reliable statistical results in biomarker studies require large sample cohorts and high effect sizes. Nonetheless, this exploratory trial confirmed the feasibility of discovering EV-associated biomarkers and monitoring circulating EV profiles in CNS diseases using the EV Neuro assay. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesGlioblastomaMultiple SclerosisBiomarkersCentral Nervous SystemFlow CytometryHumansBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseBiomarkerCNS diseasesEV phenotypingExtracellular vesiclesFlow cytometryGlioblastomaMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID37803478
PMCPMC10559539
OpenAlexW4387408660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.