Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2023
Towards deep-learning (DL) based fully automated target delineation for rectal cancer neoadjuvant radiotherapy using a divide-and-conquer strategy: a study with multicenter blind and randomized validation.
Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world clinical impact of implementing and updating a deep learning-based automatic contouring system in rectal cancer radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Multimodality Artificial Intelligence for Involved-Site Radiation Therapy: Clinical Target Volume Delineation in High-Risk Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Segmentation for pelvic malignancies in radiation oncology practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- [Expert consensus on artificial intelligence-assisted data acquisition and clinical application in electronic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- AI-Guided Delineation of Gross Tumor Volume for Body Tumors: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Incorporating patient-specific information for the development of rectal tumor auto-segmentation models for online adaptive magnetic resonance Image-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Preoperative prediction of perineural invasion of rectal cancer based on a magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model: A dual-center study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Clinical adoption of deep learning target auto-segmentation for radiation therapy: challenges, clinical risks, and mitigation strategies.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeManual clinical target volume (CTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for rectal cancer neoadjuvant radiotherapy is pivotal but labor-intensive. This study aims to propose a deep learning (DL)-based workflow towards fully automated clinical target volume (CTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation for rectal cancer neoadjuvant radiotherapy. MATERIALS &
methodsWe retrospectively included 141 patients with Stage II-III mid-low rectal cancer and randomly grouped them into training (n = 121) and testing (n = 20) cohorts. We adopted a divide-and-conquer strategy to address CTV and GTV segmentation using two separate DL models with DpuUnet as backend-one model for CTV segmentation in the CT domain, and the other for GTV in the MRI domain. The workflow was validated using a three-level multicenter-involved blind and randomized evaluation scheme. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (95HD) metrics were calculated in Level 1, four-grade expert scoring was performed in Level 2, and head-to-head Turing test in Level 3.
resultsFor the DL-based CTV contours over the testing cohort, the DSC and 95HD (mean ± SD) were 0.85 ± 0.06 and 7.75 ± 6.42 mm respectively, and 96.4% cases achieved clinical viable scores (≥ 2). The positive rate in the Turing test was 52.3%. For GTV, the DSC and 95HD were 0.87 ± 0.07 and 4.07 ± 1.67 mm respectively, and 100% of the DL-based contours achieved clinical viable scores (≥ 2). The positive rate in the Turing test was 52.0%.
conclusionThe proposed DL-based workflow exhibited promising accuracy and excellent clinical viability towards automated CTV and GTV delineation for rectal cancer neoadjuvant radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.