Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803241›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2024

Impact of persistent PSA after salvage radical prostatectomy: a multicenter study.

Felix Preisser, Reha-Baris Incesu, Pawel Rajwa, Marcin Chlosta, Florian Nohe, Mohamed Ahmed, Andre Luis Abreu, Giovanni Cacciamani, Luis Ribeiro, Alexander Kretschmer and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 15 institutions in 12 countries.

Felix Preisser *Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Reha-Baris Incesu *Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Pawel RajwaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4073-6584
Marcin ChlostaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Florian NoheMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mohamed AhmedDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andre Luis AbreuKeck Medical Center of USC, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9167-2587
Giovanni CacciamaniKeck Medical Center of USC, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Luis RibeiroUrology Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Alexander KretschmerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thilo WesthofenDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Joseph A SmithDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Thomas SteuberMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Giorgio CallerisDepartment of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3831-1632
Yannic RaskinDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paolo GonteroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Steven JoniauDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3195-9890
Rafael Sanchez-SalasDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Inderbir GillKeck Medical Center of USC, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paul CathcartUrology Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Henk Van Der PoelDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giancarlo MarraDepartment of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. d.tilki@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-1380
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · ITUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Southern California · USGuy's Hospital · GBKU Leuven · BELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JOGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKoç University · TRMedical University of Silesia · PLMedical University of Vienna · ATThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversité Paris Cité · FRVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePersistent prostatic specific antigen (PSA) represents a poor prognostic factor for recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the impact of persistent PSA on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing salvage RP is unknown. To investigate the impact of persistent PSA after salvage RP on long-term oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients who underwent salvage RP for recurrent prostate cancer between 2000 and 2021 were identified from twelve high-volume centers. Only patients with available PSA after salvage RP were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the effect of persistent PSA on biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis and any death after salvage RP. Persistent PSA was defined as a PSA-value ≥ 0.1 ng/ml, at first PSA-measurement after salvage RP.

resultsOverall, 580 patients were identified. Of those, 42% (n = 242) harbored persistent PSA. Median follow-up after salvage RP was 38 months, median time to salvage RP was 64 months and median time to first PSA after salvage RP was 2.2 months. At 84 months after salvage RP, BCR-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival was 6.6 vs. 59%, 71 vs. 88% and 77 vs. 94% for patients with persistent vs. undetectable PSA after salvage RP (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Cox models persistent PSA was an independent predictor for BCR (HR: 5.47, p < 0.001) and death (HR: 3.07, p < 0.01).

conclusionPersistent PSA is common after salvage RP and represents an independent predictor for worse oncologic outcomes. Patients undergoing salvage RP should be closely monitored after surgery to identify those with persistent PSA.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSalvage TherapyAgedBiomarkers, TumorFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37803241
PMCPMC11543598
OpenAlexW4387406131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.