Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803184›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2023

Alternative root canal filling materials to zinc oxide eugenol in primary teeth: a systematic review of the literature.

M Rhaiem, Y Elelmi, A Baaziz, M Chatti, F Maatouk, H Ghedira

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Antibacterial properties, biocompatibility, and clinical selection strategies of root canal filling materials for primary teeth].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M RhaiemPaediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia. rhaiem.miniar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-8882
Y ElelmiPaediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-7631
A BaazizPaediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-9079
M ChattiPaediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5120-5952
F MaatoukPaediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7320-8425
H GhediraPaediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1594-646X
University of Monastir · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this review was to compare the currently available root canal filling materials for primary teeth to zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) to find a suitable alternative. The search question was: which root canal filling materials used in pulpectomy for primary teeth give better clinical and radiographic success rates than ZOE?

methodsA systematic search was conducted using five databases, namely Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and EBSCOhost using a selection of "MeSH terms". The "Modified Jadad Scale" was used for the methodology assessment of the included studies.

resultsOut of 480 articles identified in the initial search, 8 articles met all the inclusion criteria. The results showed that, compared to ZOE, ZOE with calcium hydroxide and iodoform had better clinical and radiographic success rates, a resorption rate similar to that of the roots, faster resorption of extruded particles and a maximum decrease in the size of pre-operative inter-radicular radiolucencies.

conclusionNumerous materials, proposed and used by clinicians in root canal filling in primary teeth, can be recommended as alternatives to ZOE. However, none of them could be the ideal material in primary teeth. Thus, more high-quality well-designed randomised clinical trials are required to develop more high-performing materials.

Indexed as

Root Canal Filling MaterialsZinc OxideCalcium HydroxideEugenolHumansPulpectomyTooth, DeciduousZinc Oxide-Eugenol CementCalcium HydroxideEugenolRoot Canal Filling MaterialsZinc OxideZinc Oxide-Eugenol CementMaterialsPaediatric dentistryPrimary teethPulpectomyRoot canal fillingTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37803184
OpenAlexW4387397386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.