Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803163›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Retinal vascular occlusion risks during the COVID-19 pandemic and after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Hyo Song Park, Sunyeup Kim, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Suk Ho Byeon, Sung Soo Kim, Seung Won Lee, Yong Joon Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Demography, clinical profile and risk of retinal vein occlusion among patients with age-related macular degeneration - a tertiary hospital based study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hyo Song ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, South Korea.
Sunyeup KimDepartment of Medical AI, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Christopher Seungkyu LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Suk Ho ByeonDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Soo KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung Won Lee *Department of Precision Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea. lsw2920@gmail.com.
Yong Joon Kim *Department of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. kyjcolor@naver.com.
Yonsei University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRBucheon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to affect vascular networks including the eye. However, evidence on the causal relationship between COVID-19 infection and retinal vascular occlusions remains limited. This study aimed to determine the change in retinal vascular occlusion incidence during COVID-19 era and whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection induces retinal vascular occlusion. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and retinal artery occlusion (RAO) incidences during 2018-2019 and 2020-July 2021 were compared, those in confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients diagnosed from 2020 to January 2021 were calculated, and those in COVID-19 patients during 180 days prior and 180 days after diagnosis were assessed. Additionally, the standardized incidence ratio of RVOs in COVID-19 patients was analyzed. Incidence rates per 100,000 people/year of RVO during 2018-2019 and 2020-2021 was 102.0 and 98.8, respectively. RAO incidence rates during 2018-2019 and 2020-2021 were 11.7 and 12.0, respectively. In both confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients, the incidence of RVO and RAO did not change significantly from 180 days before to after diagnosis in the adjusted model. RVO incidence slightly decreased while RAO incidence increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 infection did not significantly increase RVO or RAO incidence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Retinal Artery OcclusionRetinal DiseasesRetinal Vein OcclusionHumansIncidencePandemicsRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37803163
PMCPMC10558568
OpenAlexW4387401721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.