Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803055›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Interference recommendation for the pump sizing process in progressive cavity pumps using graph neural networks.

Leandro Starke, Aurélio Faustino Hoppe, Andreza Sartori, Stefano Frizzo Stefenon, Juan Francisco De Paz Santana, Valderi Reis Quietinho Leithardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leandro StarkeDepartment of Information Systems and Computing, Regional University of Blumenau, Rua Antônio da Veiga 140, 89030-903, Blumenau, SC, Brazil.
Aurélio Faustino HoppeDepartment of Information Systems and Computing, Regional University of Blumenau, Rua Antônio da Veiga 140, 89030-903, Blumenau, SC, Brazil.
Andreza SartoriDepartment of Information Systems and Computing, Regional University of Blumenau, Rua Antônio da Veiga 140, 89030-903, Blumenau, SC, Brazil.
Stefano Frizzo StefenonFondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123, Trento, TN, Italy. sfrizzostefenon@fbk.eu.
Juan Francisco De Paz SantanaExpert Systems and Applications Lab, Faculty of Science, University of Salamanca, 37008, Salamanca, Spain.
Valderi Reis Quietinho LeithardtInstituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Rua Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2019-108883RB-C21/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pump sizing is the process of dimensional matching of an impeller and stator to provide a satisfactory performance test result and good service life during the operation of progressive cavity pumps. In this process, historical data analysis and dimensional monitoring are done manually, consuming a large number of man-hours and requiring a deep knowledge of progressive cavity pump behavior. This paper proposes the use of graph neural networks in the construction of a prototype to recommend interference during the pump sizing process in a progressive cavity pump. For this, data from different applications is used in addition to individual control spreadsheets to build the database used in the prototype. From the pre-processed data, complex network techniques and the betweenness centrality metric are used to calculate the degree of importance of each order confirmation, as well as to calculate the dimensionality of the rotors. Using the proposed method a mean squared error of 0.28 is obtained for the cases where there are recommendations for order confirmations. Based on the results achieved, it is noticeable that there is a similarity of the dimensions defined by the project engineers during the pump sizing process, and this outcome can be used to validate the new design definitions.

Identifiers

PMID37803055
PMCPMC10558576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.