Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803003›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2023

Generalization of procedural motor sequence learning after a single practice trial.

B P Johnson, I Iturrate, R Y Fakhreddine, M Bönstrup, E R Buch, E M Robertson, L G Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B P JohnsonHuman Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, USA.
I IturrateHuman Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, USA.
R Y FakhreddineHuman Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6012-4019
M BönstrupUniversity of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7237-1359
E R BuchHuman Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, USA. ethan.buch@nih.gov.
E M RobertsonCenter for Cognitive Neuroimaging, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
L G CohenHuman Cortical Physiology and Neurorehabilitation Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, USA. cohenl@ninds.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-8773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When humans begin learning new motor skills, they typically display early rapid performance improvements. It is not well understood how knowledge acquired during this early skill learning period generalizes to new, related skills. Here, we addressed this question by investigating factors influencing generalization of early learning from a skill A to a different, but related skill B. Early skill generalization was tested over four experiments (N = 2095). Subjects successively learned two related motor sequence skills (skills A and B) over different practice schedules. Skill A and B sequences shared ordinal (i.e., matching keypress locations), transitional (i.e., ordered keypress pairs), parsing rule (i.e., distinct sequence events like repeated keypresses that can be used as a breakpoint for segmenting the sequence into smaller units) structures, or possessed no structure similarities. Results showed generalization for shared parsing rule structure between skills A and B after only a single 10-second practice trial of skill A. Manipulating the initial practice exposure to skill A (1 to 12 trials) and inter-practice rest interval (0-30 s) between skills A and B had no impact on parsing rule structure generalization. Furthermore, this generalization was not explained by stronger sensorimotor mapping between individual keypress actions and their symbolic representations. In contrast, learning from skill A did not generalize to skill B during early learning when the sequences shared only ordinal or transitional structure features. These results document sequence structure that can be very rapidly generalized during initial learning to facilitate generalization of skill.

Identifiers

PMID37803003
PMCPMC10558563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.