Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37802923›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2023

The national utilization of nonoperative management for small renal masses over 10 years.

Dejan K Filipas, Edoardo Beatrici, Jose I Nolazco, Zhiyu Qian, Phillip Marks, Muhieddine Labban, Benjamin V Stone, Phillip M Pierorazio, Stuart R Lipsitz, Quoc-Dien Trinh and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dejan K FilipasDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3671-3948
Edoardo BeatriciDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jose I NolazcoDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Zhiyu QianDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Phillip MarksDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Muhieddine LabbanDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin V StoneDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Phillip M PierorazioDivision of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stuart R LipsitzDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Quoc-Dien TrinhDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3857-9276
Steven L ChangDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander P ColeDepartment of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-8529
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of small renal masses often involves a nonoperative approach, but there is a paucity of information about the use and associated predictors of such approaches. This study aimed to determine the trends in and predictors of use of nonoperative management of small renal masses.

methodsUsing data from the National Cancer Database for localized small renal masses (N0/M0, cT1a) diagnosed between 2010 and 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional study. Nonoperative management was defined as expectant management (active surveillance or watchful waiting) or focal ablation. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsOf the 156 734 patients included, 10.5% underwent expectant management, and 13.9% underwent focal ablation. Later year of diagnosis was associated with a higher likelihood of nonoperative management. In 2020, the odds of receiving expectant management and focal ablation were 90% (AOR = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71 to 2.11) and 44% (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.57) higher, respectively, than in 2010. Black patients had increased odds of expectant management (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.39 to 1.55) but decreased odds of focal ablation (AOR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.99).

conclusionOver the decade, the use nonoperative management of small renal masses increased, with expectant management more frequently used than focal ablation among Black patients. Possible explanations include race-based differences in physicians' risk assessments and resource allocation. Adjusting for Black race in calculations for glomerular filtration rate could influence the differential uptake of these techniques through deflated glomerular filtration rate calculations. These findings highlight the need for research and policies to ensure equitable use of less invasive treatments in small renal masses.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsAblation TechniquesBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRisk AssessmentWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID37802923
PMCPMC10640883
OpenAlexW4387393681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.