Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37802611›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Colon CApsule endoscopy compared to conventional COlonoscopy in patients with colonic DIverticulitis: the study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial (CACODI trial).

Benedicte Schelde-Olesen, Lasse Kaalby, Ulrik Deding, Maja M I Thygesen, Per Vadgaard Andersen, Anastasios Koulaouzidis, Gunnar Baatrup, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05700981 (Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Patients With Colonic Diverticulitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700981 naunknown statusnot on this map

Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Patients With Colonic Diverticulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsDiverticulitis, ColonicArmscolon capsule endoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benedicte Schelde-OlesenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark benedicte.schelde-olesen@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-2350
Lasse KaalbyDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ulrik DedingDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8263-2989
Maja M I ThygesenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Per Vadgaard AndersenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Gunnar BaatrupDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Thomas Bjørsum-MeyerDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFollow-up after an episode of colonic diverticulitis is a common indication for colonoscopy, even though studies have shown a low risk of positive findings in this population. Our objective is to investigate colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) as a follow-up examination in patients with colonic diverticulitis compared with colonoscopy, particularly regarding patient satisfaction and clinical performance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a single-centre prospective randomised controlled trial. Patients seen at Odense University Hospital with acute diverticulitis confirmed by CT will be included and randomised to either follow-up by colonoscopy or CCE. Detection of suspected cancer, more than two polyps or any number of polyps larger than 9 mm in CCE will generate an invitation to a diagnostic colonoscopy for biopsies or polyp removal. We will compare colonoscopy and CCE regarding patient satisfaction and tolerance, the number of complete examinations, the number of patients referred to a subsequent colonoscopy after CCE and the prevalence of diverticula, polyps, cancers and other abnormal findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Informed consent will be obtained from all participants before randomisation. The study was approved by the regional ethics committee (ref. S-20210127) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (ref. 22/43235). After completion of the trial, we plan to publish two articles in high-impact journals. One article on both primary and secondary outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05700981.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsDiverticulitis, ColonicColonoscopyEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical TrialDiagnostic ImagingEndoscopyPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID37802611
PMCPMC10565239
OpenAlexW4387439932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.