ArticleContraception2024
An exploratory study on the possible association of serum etonogestrel concentrations with mood concerns and symptoms among contraceptive implant users.
Article in Contraception, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of different long-acting reversible contraceptive methods on female sexual function: a retrospective cohort study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate if inter-individual variability in serum etonogestrel (ENG) concentrations accounts for variability in mood-related side effects among ENG implant users. STUDY
designParticipants underwent a single-time blood draw for measurement of serum ENG concentrations using a liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry assay, and completed a questionnaire at enrollment that retrospectively assessed mood-related side effects during the period of implant use. For a subset of participants, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores, obtained for other clinical purposes, were also compared. We used independent medians tests and linear regression to evaluate associations between mood symptoms and serum ENG concentrations as our primary outcome.
resultsAmong 900 enrolled participants, 34% (306/900) reported mood changes on the baseline questionnaire. Of these, 31 (3.4%) participants also had documented PHQ-9 scores. Serum ENG concentrations (median 126.9 pg/mL [range 39.4-695.1]) were not associated with reported mood changes on the questionnaire (p = 0.19) or on the PHQ-9 (β = 0.00, 95% CI -0.03, 0.03).
conclusionPharmacokinetic variability does not explain the inter-individual variability in mood-related side effects among ENG implant users. IMPLICATIONS: Mood-related side effects and altered mental health metrics are commonly reported by etonogestrel contraceptive implant users but demonstrate wide inter-individual variability. Individual differences in serum drug levels do not appear to account for this variability in mood-related side effects, and so future research should focus on novel personal factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.