Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37801898›Full record

ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

Long-term outcomes of lung cancer screening in males and females.

Margherita Ruggirello, Camilla Valsecchi, Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, Federica Sabia, Raffaella Vigorito, Gabriella Sozzi, Ugo Pastorino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margherita RuggirelloDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Camilla ValsecchiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Roberta Eufrasia LeddaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Federica SabiaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Raffaella VigoritoDepartment of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella SozziTumour Genomics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ugo PastorinoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: ugo.pastorino@istitutotumori.mi.it.

Funding

Identifying non-coding RNAs for early detection and prevention of lung cancerU01CA166905 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROCE, CARLO M, PASS, HARVEY IRA · 2013 to 2017
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explored female and male overall mortality and lung cancer (LC) survival in two LC screening (LCS) populations, focusing on the predictive value of coronary artery calcification (CAC) at baseline low-dose computed tomography (LDCT).

methodsThis retrospective study analysed data of 6495 heavy smokers enrolled in the MILD and BioMILD LCS trials between 2005 and 2016. The primary objective of the study was to assess sex differences in all-cause mortality and LC survival. CAC scores were automatically calculated on LDCT images by a validated artificial intelligence (AI) software. Sex differences in 12-year cause-specific mortality rates were stratified by age, pack-years and CAC score.

resultsThe study included 2368 females and 4127 males. The 12-year all-cause mortality rates were 4.1 % in females and 7.7 % in males (p < 0.0001), and median CAC score was 8.7 vs. 41 respectively (p < 0.0001). All-cause mortality increased with rising CAC scores (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) for both sexes. Although LC incidence was not different between the two sexes, females had lower rates of 12-year LC mortality (1.0 % vs. 1.9 %, p = 0.0052), and better LC survival from diagnosis (72.3 % vs. 51.7 %; p = 0.0005), with a similar proportion of stage I (58.1 % vs. 51.2 %, p = 0.2782).

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that female LCS participants had lower rates of all-cause mortality at 12 years and better LC survival than their male counterparts, with similar LC incidence rates and stage at diagnosis. The lower CAC burden observed in women at all ages might contribute to explain their lower rates of all-cause mortality and better LC survival.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseLung NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAll-cause mortalityArtificial intelligenceCoronary artery calcificationsFemale lung cancerLow-dose computed tomographyLung cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID37801898
PMCPMC10788694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.