Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37801640›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2023

Outcomes of Chylothorax Nonoperative Management After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laura Lucato Dos Santos, Clara Lucato Dos Santos, Natasha Kasakevic Tsan Hu, Leticia Nogueira Datrino, Guilherme Tavares, Luca Schiliró Tristão, Marina Feliciano Orlandini, Maria Carolina Andrade Serafim, Francisco Tustumi

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Lucato Dos SantosDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clara Lucato Dos SantosDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Natasha Kasakevic Tsan HuDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leticia Nogueira DatrinoDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme TavaresDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luca Schiliró TristãoDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marina Feliciano OrlandiniDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Carolina Andrade SerafimDepartament of Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Centro Universitário Lusíada, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco TustumiDepartament of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6695-0496
Centro Universitário Lusíada · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChylothorax after thoracic surgery is a severe complication with high morbidity and mortality rate of 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06 - 0.02). There is no agreement on whether nonoperative treatment or early reoperation should be the initial intervention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the conservative approach to treat chyle leakage after cardiothoracic surgeries.

methodsA systematic review was conducted in PubMed®, Embase, Cochrane Library Central, and LILACS (Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde) databases; a manual search of references was also done. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery, patients who received any nonoperative treatment (e.g., total parenteral nutrition, low-fat diet, medium chain triglycerides), and studies that evaluated chylothorax resolution, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, infection, morbidity, and mortality. CENTRAL MESSAGE: Nonoperative treatment for chylothorax after cardiothoracic procedures has significant hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and reoperation rates.

resultsTwenty-two articles were selected. Pulmonary complications, infections, and arrhythmia were the most common complications after surgical procedures. The incidence of chylothorax in cardiothoracic surgery was 1.8% (95% CI 1.7 - 2%). The mean time of maintenance of the chest tube was 16.08 days (95% CI 12.54 - 19.63), and the length of hospital stay was 23.74 days (95% CI 16.08 - 31.42) in patients with chylothorax receiving nonoperative treatment. Among patients that received conservative treatment, the morbidity event was 0.40 (95% CI 0.23 - 0.59), and reoperation rate was 0.37 (95% CI 0.27 - 0.49). Mortality rate was 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 - 0.02).

conclusionNonoperative treatment for chylothorax after cardiothoracic procedures has significant hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and reoperation rates.

Indexed as

ChylothoraxThoracic Surgical ProceduresHumansParenteral Nutrition, TotalPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCardiac ArrhythmiasChylothoraxLymphatic SystemMorbidityReoperationThoracic DuctThoracic Surgery

Identifiers

PMID37801640
PMCPMC10552558
OpenAlexW4387420474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.