Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37801625›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2024

Effect of Propofol on Heart Rate and Its Coupling to Cortical Slow Waves in Humans.

Marco S Fabus, Jamie W Sleigh, Catherine E Warnaby

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06736938 (Efficacy and Safety of Balanced Analgosedation in Bronchoscopy With Propofol/Pethidine Versus Midazolam/Pethidine), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06736938 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Balanced Analgosedation in Bronchoscopy With Propofol/Pethidine Versus Midazolam/Pethidine: a Single-centre Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Andrea Cesalpino Arezzo ONLUSRan2025 to 2027Enrolled530ConditionsSedation During BronchoscopyArmsPropofol 1%, Midazolam, Pethidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco S FabusWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, and Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4966-4647
Jamie W SleighDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1966-5825
Catherine E WarnabyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, and Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-487X
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R006423/1Wellcome Trust 203139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropofol causes significant cardiovascular depression and a slowing of neurophysiological activity. However, literature on its effect on the heart rate remains mixed, and it is not known whether cortical slow waves are related to cardiac activity in propofol anesthesia.

methodsThe authors performed a secondary analysis of electrocardiographic and electroencephalographic data collected as part of a previously published study where n = 16 healthy volunteers underwent a slow infusion of propofol up to an estimated effect-site concentration of 4 µg/ml. Heart rate, heart rate variability, and individual slow electroencephalographic waves were extracted for each subject. Timing between slow-wave start and the preceding R-wave was tested against a uniform random surrogate. Heart rate data were further examined as a post hoc analysis in n = 96 members of an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status II/III older clinical population collected as part of the AlphaMax trial.

resultsThe slow propofol infusion increased the heart rate in a dose-dependent manner (mean ± SD, increase of +4.2 ± 1.5 beats/min/[μg ml-1]; P < 0.001). The effect was smaller but still significant in the older clinical population. In healthy volunteers, propofol decreased the electrocardiogram R-wave amplitude (median [25th to 75th percentile], decrease of -83 [-245 to -28] μV; P < 0.001). Heart rate variability showed a loss of high-frequency parasympathetic activity. Individual cortical slow waves were coupled to the heartbeat. Heartbeat incidence peaked about 450 ms before slow-wave onset, and mean slow-wave frequency correlated with mean heart rate.

conclusionsThe authors observed a robust increase in heart rate with increasing propofol concentrations in healthy volunteers and patients. This was likely due to decreased parasympathetic cardioinhibition. Similar to non-rapid eye movement sleep, cortical slow waves are coupled to the cardiac rhythm, perhaps due to a common brainstem generator. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPropofolElectroencephalographyHeart RateHumansPropofol

Identifiers

PMID37801625
PMCPMC7615371
OpenAlexW4387409975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.