Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37801493›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Radiogenomic-based multiomic analysis reveals imaging intratumor heterogeneity phenotypes and therapeutic targets.

Guan-Hua Su, Yi Xiao, Chao You, Ren-Cheng Zheng, Shen Zhao, Shi-Yun Sun, Jia-Yin Zhou, Lu-Yi Lin, He Wang, Zhi-Ming Shao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guan-Hua SuKey Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0009-0002-9373-8663
Yi XiaoKey Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-9921
Chao YouDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9420-1919
Ren-Cheng ZhengInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-0192
Shen ZhaoKey Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4357-7454
Shi-Yun SunDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1649-6744
Jia-Yin ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8623-0981
Lu-Yi LinDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
He WangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2053-9439
Zhi-Ming ShaoKey Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-148X
Ya-Jia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6130-859X
Yi-Zhou JiangKey Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-2630
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) profoundly affects therapeutic responses and clinical outcomes. However, the widespread methods for assessing ITH based on genomic sequencing or pathological slides, which rely on limited tissue samples, may lead to inaccuracies due to potential sampling biases. Using a newly established multicenter breast cancer radio-multiomic dataset (

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMultiomicsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID37801493
PMCPMC10558123
OpenAlexW4387397290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.