Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37801087›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Over ninety years old: Does high cognitive reserve still help brain efficiency?

Elisa Carta, Alice Riccardi, Silvia Marinetto, Sara Mattivi, Enrico Selini, Veronica Pucci, Sara Mondini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa CartaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Multiple Sclerosis Centre Binaghi Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Alice RiccardiMultiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neurosciences-DNS, University-Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Silvia MarinettoIndependent Researcher, Padua, Italy.
Sara MattiviIndependent Researcher, Padua, Italy.
Enrico SeliniDipartimento di Filosofia Sociologia Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Veronica PucciDipartimento di Filosofia Sociologia Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Sara MondiniDipartimento di Filosofia Sociologia Pedagogia e Psicologia Applicata (FISPPA), University of Padua, Padua, Italy. sara.mondini@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonagenarians and centenarians, also called oldest-old, are a very heterogeneous population that counts a limited number of individuals as it is a real challenge to reach this goal. Even if it is well known that cognitive reserve can be considered a factor in maintaining good cognitive functioning in ageing, only very few studies have been carried out on the role of cognitive reserve (CR) in the oldest-old people. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between cognitive reserve and cognitive functioning in a population living in a specific region of Italy, the Blue Zone in Sardinia. This population is characterised by extreme longevity and distinctive historical, geographic, social, linguistic and nutritional features. The cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq) and the short cognitive Esame Neuropsicologico Breve-2 (ENB-2, Brief Neuropsychological Examination) were administered to 67 participants, all aged between 90 and 105 years old. The CRIq was a predictor of neuropsychological performance for the global score of the battery of tests, ENB-2 (ENB-tot) and also for 7 out of 16 of its sub-tests. All except one (Token) tapped executive functions (Interference memory at 10 and 30 s, TMT-B, Overlapping figures, Abstraction, Fluency). Results highlight that also in the oldest-old population CR has a positive effect on cognition, especially on executive functioning.

Indexed as

Cognitive ReserveAged, 80 and overBrainCognitionExecutive FunctionHumansNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID37801087
PMCPMC10858058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.