Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37800988›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2023

Individual differences in speech-on-speech masking are correlated with cognitive and visual task performance.

Andrew J Byrne, Christopher Conroy, Gerald Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew J ByrneDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences and Hearing Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-6927
Christopher ConroyDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York 10036, USA.
Gerald KiddDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences and Hearing Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

Funding

CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY MASKINGR01DC004545 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2000 to 2021
$9.0M
Top-Down Control of Selective AmplificationR01DC013286 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BEST, VIRGINIA ANN, KIDD, GERALD, JR · 2014 to 2023
$6.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in spatial tuning for masked target speech identification were determined using maskers that varied in type and proximity to the target source. The maskers were chosen to produce three strengths of informational masking (IM): high [same-gender, speech-on-speech (SOS) masking], intermediate (the same masker speech time-reversed), and low (speech-shaped, speech-envelope-modulated noise). Typical for this task, individual differences increased as IM increased, while overall performance decreased. To determine the extent to which auditory performance might generalize to another sensory modality, a comparison visual task was also implemented. Visual search time was measured for identifying a cued object among "clouds" of distractors that were varied symmetrically in proximity to the target. The visual maskers also were chosen to produce three strengths of an analog of IM based on feature similarities between the target and maskers. Significant correlations were found for overall auditory and visual task performance, and both of these measures were correlated with an index of general cognitive reasoning. Overall, the findings provide qualified support for the proposition that the ability of an individual to solve IM-dominated tasks depends on cognitive mechanisms that operate in common across sensory modalities.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCognitionIndividualityPerceptual MaskingTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37800988
PMCPMC10631817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.